These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7037832)

  • 1. Evaluation of the B-D urine culture kit.
    Guenther KL; Washington JA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Dec; 14(6):628-30. PubMed ID: 7037832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the B-D urine culture kit with a standard culture method and with the MS-2.
    Hubbard WA; Shalis PJ; McClatchey KD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Feb; 17(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 6339550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbiologic evaluation of canine urine: direct microscopic examination and preservation of specimen quality for culture.
    Allen TA; Jones RL; Purvance J
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1987 May; 190(10):1289-91. PubMed ID: 3294768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of preservative fluid for urine collected for culture.
    Lauer BA; Reller LB; Mirrett S
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Jul; 10(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 500793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the Becton-Dickinson urine culture tube with the Abbott MS-2 urine screening system.
    Southern PM; Luttrell B
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1984 Jun; 2(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 6378504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urine culture transport tubes: effect of sample volume on bacterial toxicity of the preservative.
    Nickander KK; Shanholtzer CJ; Peterson LR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 15(4):593-5. PubMed ID: 7040459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation and optimization of urine screening by Autobac.
    Kelly MT; Balfour LC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Apr; 13(4):677-80. PubMed ID: 7014617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of the transport on the outcome of the bacteriological analysis of dog urine comparison of three transport tubes.
    Perrin J; Nicolet J
    Zentralbl Veterinarmed B; 1992 Nov; 39(9):662-7. PubMed ID: 1492522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical laboratory evaluation of a bacteriuria detection device for urine screening.
    Davis JR; Stager CE; Araj GF
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Jan; 81(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 6362393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of liquid and lyophilized preservatives for urine culture.
    Weinstein MP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Oct; 18(4):912-6. PubMed ID: 6630469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reverse-flow apparatus for enhanced colorimetric detection of bacteriuria.
    Wallis C; Melnick JL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Nov; 20(5):942-4. PubMed ID: 6392325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a rapid bacteriuria screening instrument.
    Cashman JS; Ahlin PA; Matsen JM
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1984 Jan; 2(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 6399478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of commercial boric acid containing vials for urine culture: low risk of contamination and cost effectiveness considerations.
    Appannanavar SB; Biswal M; Rajkumari N; Mohan B; Taneja N
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2013; 56(3):261-4. PubMed ID: 24152505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the MS-2 and Lumac systems for the rapid screening of urine specimens.
    Welch WD; Layman MA; Southern PM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 May; 81(5):629-33. PubMed ID: 6372433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of different sampling methods and criteria for diagnosing canine urinary tract infection by quantitative bacterial culture.
    Sørensen TM; Jensen AB; Damborg P; Bjørnvad CR; Guardabassi L; Jessen LR
    Vet J; 2016 Oct; 216():168-73. PubMed ID: 27687946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of the B-D Urine Culture Kit on an automated bacteriuria screen.
    Pezzlo MT; Conway S; Jacobson M; Peterson EM; de la Maza LM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1207-8. PubMed ID: 6520228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rapid semiautomated screening and processing of urine specimens.
    Jenkins RD; Hale DC; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Mar; 11(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 6991523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative bacterial culture of urine. II. Evaluation of 10 different screening methods for the diagnosis of bacteriuria compared with results obtained by the dilution technique.
    Vejlsgaard R; Justesen T
    Acta Med Scand; 1973 Mar; 193(3):147-59. PubMed ID: 4571477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of bacteriuria and pyuria by URISCREEN a rapid enzymatic screening test.
    Pezzlo MT; Amsterdam D; Anhalt JP; Lawrence T; Stratton NJ; Vetter EA; Peterson EM; de la Maza LM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Mar; 30(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 1551986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of bacteriuria by automated electrical impedance monitoring in a clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Throm R; Specter S; Strauss R; Friedman H
    J Clin Microbiol; 1977 Sep; 6(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 332712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.