These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7037832)

  • 21. Pyuria and bacteriuria in urine specimens obtained by catheter from young children with fever.
    Hoberman A; Wald ER; Reynolds EA; Penchansky L; Charron M
    J Pediatr; 1994 Apr; 124(4):513-9. PubMed ID: 8151463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of total laboratory automation on workflow and specimen processing time for culture of urine specimens.
    Yarbrough ML; Lainhart W; McMullen AR; Anderson NW; Burnham CD
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 Dec; 37(12):2405-2411. PubMed ID: 30269180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of microscopic examination for bacteriuria.
    Yu HD
    Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Xue Za Zhi; 1978 Mar; 11(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 357101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microbiological evaluation of a commercial transport system for urine samples.
    Eriksson I; Lindman R; Thore M
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2002; 62(5):325-35. PubMed ID: 12387577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of the Bac-T-Screen to predict bacteriuria from urine specimens held at room temperature.
    Wright DN; Saxon B; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Aug; 24(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 3528212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of boric acid on bacterial culture of canine and feline urine.
    Rowlands M; Blackwood L; Mas A; Cripps P; Crompton C; Burrow R
    J Small Anim Pract; 2011 Oct; 52(10):510-4. PubMed ID: 21967098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of Sysmex UF-100 urine flow cytometer vs chamber counting of supravitally stained specimens and conventional bacterial cultures.
    Kouri TT; Kähkönen U; Malminiemi K; Vuento R; Rowan RM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jul; 112(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10396282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rapid screening for bacteriuria with a laser nephelometer.
    Bayardelle P; Richet H
    Can J Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 30(7):927-9. PubMed ID: 6383582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Boric acid preservation of urine samples.
    Porter IA; Brodie J
    Br Med J; 1969 May; 2(5653):353-5. PubMed ID: 5768462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical laboratory evaluation of a urine screening device.
    Pfaller MA; Baum CA; Niles AC; Murray PR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):674-9. PubMed ID: 6195180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the MS-2 urine screening system.
    Smith JA; Ngui-Yen J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):509-11. PubMed ID: 6355144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of the API Uriscreen with the Vitek Urine Identification-3 and the leukocyte esterase or nitrite strip as a screening test for bacteriuria.
    Dalton MT; Comeau S; Rainnie B; Lambert K; Forward KR
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1993 Feb; 16(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 8467632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Initial testing of a novel urine culture device.
    Rosenberg M; Berger SA; Barki M; Goldberg S; Fink A; Miskin A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Oct; 30(10):2686-91. PubMed ID: 1400968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a new, semiquantitative screening culture device for urine specimens.
    Ferguson J; Tanner J; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 May; 33(5):1351-3. PubMed ID: 7615754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Editorial: Urine culture made easy.
    Chugh KS
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1974 Mar; 22(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 4602419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is the clean-catch midstream void procedure necessary for obtaining urine culture specimens from men?
    Lipsky BA; Inui TS; Plorde JJ; Berger RE
    Am J Med; 1984 Feb; 76(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 6695949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of a new commercial kit (UROBACT) for detection of bacteriuria.
    Christensen KK; Christensen P
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 1987 May; 5(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 3303249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of specimen processing delay on borate urine preservation.
    Gillespie T; Fewster J; Masterton RG
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Feb; 52(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 10396234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rapid screening for bacteriuria by light scatter photometry (Autobac): a collaborative study.
    Hale DC; Wright DN; McKie JE; Isenberg HD; Jenkins RD; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):147-50. PubMed ID: 7007418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of microbiological processing of urine specimens: comparison of overnight versus two-day incubation.
    Murray P; Traynor P; Hopson D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jun; 30(6):1600-1. PubMed ID: 1624584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.