105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 703896)
1. The second opinion at its best.
Fleming WH
Nebr Med J; 1978 Sep; 63(9):306-7. PubMed ID: 703896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Second opinion elective surgery program: a concept whose time has come?
McCarthy EG; Finkel ML
Empl Benefits J; 1979; 4(3):34-8. PubMed ID: 10316851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Going strong: second opinion campaign.
Forum (Wash); 1980 Aug; 4(3):42-3. PubMed ID: 7191397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [A second opinion before elective operations].
Adar R
Harefuah; 1982 Jan; 102(2):82-3. PubMed ID: 7095636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Second opinion program reduces surgical procedures, produces no net savings.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1977 Dec; 32(6):53-4. PubMed ID: 10316529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Programs prove effective second surgical opinion.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1984 Oct; 39(4):56, 60, 64. PubMed ID: 10317554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Second surgical opinion programs: status report.
Conn Med; 1983 Jun; 47(6):363-5. PubMed ID: 6884019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Second surgical opinion programs: evaluation deficiencies.
Dunham MH; Hunt VB
Wis Med J; 1984 Apr; 83(4):23-4. PubMed ID: 6428066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stop and listen to a second opinion.
Slayton A
Aging; 1979; (299-300):16-8. PubMed ID: 10316905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Federal Second Opinion Program in Connecticut.
Freedman JK
Conn Med; 1978 Dec; 42(12):810-1. PubMed ID: 720055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Trustees urge second surgical opinion.
Porter PE
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1987 Jan; 190(1):36-7. PubMed ID: 3818414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a surgical second opinion program.
Schachter M; Oppenheimer G; Cannoodt L; Sieverts S
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1983 Jan; 9(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 6403901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Public isn't using second opinion surgical benefits, insurers claim.
Stoltz MK
Health Care Week; 1978 Oct; 2(14):3, 12. PubMed ID: 10316686
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [AMASCO: a second opinion is possible].
Wilhelm J
Krankenpfl Soins Infirm; 1991 Dec; 84(12):32. PubMed ID: 1774936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The sentinel effect in second opinion programs.
Martin SG
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1982 Feb; 36(8):24, 26. PubMed ID: 10317179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New York research says second opinion programs permanently defer surgery.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1976 Oct; 31(4):32, 34. PubMed ID: 1037582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Second surgical opinion: more emphasis needed.
Alkire A
Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1981 Mar; 85(13):11, 33. PubMed ID: 10317080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bay State mandates second opinion.
Med World News; 1978 Mar; 19(6):59. PubMed ID: 10316570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Second opinion plans seen saving money.
Piontek S
Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1981 Feb; 85(8):1, 20-1. PubMed ID: 10317067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Second opinion plan approved.
Am Med News; 1979 Mar; 22(13):1, 13. PubMed ID: 10325176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
