119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7040203)
1. Success in CON process depends on constructive attitudes and actions.
Coffey RJ
Hospitals; 1982 May; 56(10):71-4. PubMed ID: 7040203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. HSAs misuse draft CON checklist.
Simler SL
Mod Healthc; 1979 Nov; 9(11):30. PubMed ID: 492113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Certificate of need: an approach to the process.
Knowles EW
Health Care Plann Mark; 1981 Oct; 1(3):27-34. PubMed ID: 10253117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Certification of need programs: regulation in search of the evaluation process.
Studnicki J
Evaluation; 1975; 2(2):94-6. PubMed ID: 10246169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A riled community attacks HSA plans.
Honey RB
Patient Care; 1980 Aug; 14(14):184, 186-7, 190 passim. PubMed ID: 10247718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Justify CON applications thoroughly.
Bogumil WA; Jones TH; Martin J
OH; 1982 Oct; 26(9):14-7. PubMed ID: 10258009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra-organizational strategic decision model in the certificate-of-need application process.
Levy MG; Covaleski MA; Johnson AC
Health Care Manage Rev; 1982; 7(2):25-36. PubMed ID: 7050018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Certificate of Need: a planning process in transition.
Rountree GD
Tex Hosp; 1980 Jun; 36(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 10297845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pennsylvania's new certificate-of-need law.
Schwartz JB
Health Law Proj Libr Bull; 1979; 4(11-12):364-70. PubMed ID: 10278035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. HSA, hospital planning: arena of conflict offers room for cooperation.
Pierce CF
Hospitals; 1980 Mar; 54(6):63-6. PubMed ID: 7188764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Health planning and the CON: changing directions.
Hash MM
Mich Hosp; 1986 Jul; 22(7):27-32. PubMed ID: 10277374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Institutional planning: the future is now.
Roark CE
Tex Hosp; 1978 Dec; 34(7):19-21. PubMed ID: 10277908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-range hospital development necessitates strategic planning.
Domanico L
Hosp Financ Manage; 1981 Jan; 35(1):38-40, 42-4, 46 passim. PubMed ID: 10298116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Humana's exemption from Ky. CON process approved.
Nemes J
Mod Healthc; 1990 Jun; 20(24):3-4. PubMed ID: 10105084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. CON process causes huge waste, duplication by providers, planners.
Horty JF
Mod Healthc; 1980 Nov; 10(11):104, 107. PubMed ID: 10278081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hospitals hurdle CON barriers differently.
Cherskov M
Hospitals; 1986 May; 60(10):89. PubMed ID: 3699745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. CON: an added burden for smaller hospitals.
Meeker RA
Mich Hosp; 1987 Sep; 23(9):27-8, 30. PubMed ID: 10283547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospital construction boom not expected despite end of some state CON programs.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1987 Nov; 17(23):134. PubMed ID: 10284669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Regulators' view of the CON.
Robischon T
Appl Radiol; 1981; 10(4):50, 53, 55-6. PubMed ID: 10254035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Knowing a review agency's "acceptability range' may help in obtaining CON approval.
Lee KE; Liu K
Hospitals; 1982 Nov; 56(21):42. PubMed ID: 7118123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
