143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7042744)
1. Evaluation of the Enteric-Tek system for identifying Enterobacteriaceae.
Esaias AO; Rhoden DL; Smith PB
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Mar; 15(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 7042744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the automicrobic and enteric-tek systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Goldstein J; Guarneri JJ; Della-Latta P; Scherer J
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 15(4):654-9. PubMed ID: 7040462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media.
Barry AL; Badal RE
J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Sep; 10(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 385617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Appelbaum PC; Arthur RR; Parker ME; Shugar GL; von Kuster LC; Charache P
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 1(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 6756905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Vitek 2 ID-GNB assay for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other nonenteric gram-negative bacilli and comparison with the Vitek GNI+ card.
O'Hara CM; Miller JM
J Clin Microbiol; 2003 May; 41(5):2096-101. PubMed ID: 12734254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Spectrum-10 system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
Vuye A
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 27(10):2366-8. PubMed ID: 2685033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.
O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of the MS-2 system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a collaborative study with blindly assigned reference stains.
Yamane N; Kato H; Saitoh Y; Mukojima T; Matsuoka K
J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1135-9. PubMed ID: 6394615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. R-B enteric differential system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Smith PB; Rhoden DL; Tomfohrde KM; Dunn CR; Balows A; Hermann GJ
Appl Microbiol; 1971 Jun; 21(6):1036-9. PubMed ID: 4935490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the MIC 2000 enteric media with API 20 E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Courcol RJ; Husson MO; Izard DE; Martin GR
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Sep; 252(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 6758421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli.
O'Hara CM; Tenover FC; Miller JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Dec; 31(12):3165-9. PubMed ID: 8308108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli.
O'Hara CM
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of new computer-enhanced identification program for microorganisms: adaptation of BioBASE for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
Miller JM; Alachi P
J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jan; 34(1):179-81. PubMed ID: 8748298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.
Aldridge KE; Hodges RL
J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 7007414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supplementary rapid biochemical test panel for the API 20E bacterial identification system.
Edinger RC; Migneault PC; Nolte FS
J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 22(6):1063-5. PubMed ID: 3905846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Mini-ID Enterobacteriaceae screen system.
O'Hara CM; Smith PB; Schable BA
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Dec; 26(12):2604-7. PubMed ID: 3068253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multipoint identification of Enterobacteriaceae: report of the British Society for Microbial Technology collaborative study.
Winstanley TG; Limb DI; Wheat PF; Nicol CD
J Clin Pathol; 1993 Jul; 46(7):637-41. PubMed ID: 8157751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enterosistem 18-R: description and comparative evaluation with conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
Piccolomini R; Di Girolamo A; Catamo G; Cellini L; Allocati N; Ravagnan G
J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 29(10):2300-4. PubMed ID: 1939588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
Kelly MT; Latimer JM
J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
