These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7042744)
1. Evaluation of the Enteric-Tek system for identifying Enterobacteriaceae. Esaias AO; Rhoden DL; Smith PB J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Mar; 15(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 7042744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the automicrobic and enteric-tek systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Goldstein J; Guarneri JJ; Della-Latta P; Scherer J J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 15(4):654-9. PubMed ID: 7040462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media. Barry AL; Badal RE J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Sep; 10(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 385617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of three methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appelbaum PC; Arthur RR; Parker ME; Shugar GL; von Kuster LC; Charache P Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Apr; 1(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 6756905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods. Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Vitek 2 ID-GNB assay for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and other nonenteric gram-negative bacilli and comparison with the Vitek GNI+ card. O'Hara CM; Miller JM J Clin Microbiol; 2003 May; 41(5):2096-101. PubMed ID: 12734254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Spectrum-10 system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Vuye A J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 27(10):2366-8. PubMed ID: 2685033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product. O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of the MS-2 system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a collaborative study with blindly assigned reference stains. Yamane N; Kato H; Saitoh Y; Mukojima T; Matsuoka K J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Dec; 20(6):1135-9. PubMed ID: 6394615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. R-B enteric differential system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Smith PB; Rhoden DL; Tomfohrde KM; Dunn CR; Balows A; Hermann GJ Appl Microbiol; 1971 Jun; 21(6):1036-9. PubMed ID: 4935490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the MIC 2000 enteric media with API 20 E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Courcol RJ; Husson MO; Izard DE; Martin GR Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Sep; 252(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 6758421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parallel comparison of accuracy of API 20E, Vitek GNI, MicroScan Walk/Away Rapid ID, and Becton Dickinson Cobas Micro ID-E/NF for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and common gram-negative, non-glucose-fermenting bacilli. O'Hara CM; Tenover FC; Miller JM J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Dec; 31(12):3165-9. PubMed ID: 8308108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli. O'Hara CM J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of new computer-enhanced identification program for microorganisms: adaptation of BioBASE for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Miller JM; Alachi P J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jan; 34(1):179-81. PubMed ID: 8748298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation studies of entero-set 20, API 20E and conventional media systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification. Aldridge KE; Hodges RL J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jan; 13(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 7007414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supplementary rapid biochemical test panel for the API 20E bacterial identification system. Edinger RC; Migneault PC; Nolte FS J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec; 22(6):1063-5. PubMed ID: 3905846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Mini-ID Enterobacteriaceae screen system. O'Hara CM; Smith PB; Schable BA J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Dec; 26(12):2604-7. PubMed ID: 3068253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multipoint identification of Enterobacteriaceae: report of the British Society for Microbial Technology collaborative study. Winstanley TG; Limb DI; Wheat PF; Nicol CD J Clin Pathol; 1993 Jul; 46(7):637-41. PubMed ID: 8157751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enterosistem 18-R: description and comparative evaluation with conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Piccolomini R; Di Girolamo A; Catamo G; Cellini L; Allocati N; Ravagnan G J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 29(10):2300-4. PubMed ID: 1939588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the automicrobic system with API, enterotube, micro-ID, micro-media systems, and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Kelly MT; Latimer JM J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Nov; 12(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 7024296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]