144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7044339)
1. Short-term tests in assessment of cancer risks and in primary prevention of occupational cancer.
Schramm T
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1982; 52(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 7044339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Epidemiological and experimental applications to occupational cancer prevention.
Vainio H; Hemminki K
J UOEH; 1989 Mar; 11 Suppl():323-45. PubMed ID: 2664947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The significance of in-vitro tests with respect to testing of substances for carcinogenic activities (author's transl)].
Schramm T; Teichmann B; Butschak G
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1977; 47(6):567-80. PubMed ID: 415699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which rules for assembling short-term test batteries to predict carcinogenicity?
Benigni R; Giuliani A
Mol Toxicol; 1987; 1(2-3):143-66. PubMed ID: 3449755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
Gaylor DW
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro testing for carcinogens and mutagens.
Santella RM
Occup Med; 1987; 2(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 3306977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effective use of rapid tests to evaluate the mutagenicity of environmental chemicals].
de Serres FJ
Genetika; 1978 Jun; 14(6):935-46. PubMed ID: 680560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Failure of the standard battery of short-term tests in detecting some rodent and human genotoxic carcinogens.
Brambilla G; Martelli A
Toxicology; 2004 Mar; 196(1-2):1-19. PubMed ID: 15036752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chemical carcinogens: screening, testing, risk assessment for man.
Schramm T; Teichmann B
Neoplasma; 1981; 28(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 7254431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Testing strategies in mutagenicity and genetic toxicology: an appraisal of the guidelines of the European Scientific Committee for Cosmetics and Non-Food Products for the evaluation of hair dyes.
Kirkland DJ; Henderson L; Marzin D; Müller L; Parry JM; Speit G; Tweats DJ; Williams GM
Mutat Res; 2005 Dec; 588(2):88-105. PubMed ID: 16326131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing of chemicals for carcinogenic activities and some problems related to the assessment of carcinogenic risks to men.
Schramm T; Teichmann B
Pol J Pharmacol Pharm; 1979; 31(6):639-45. PubMed ID: 550120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Chemicals and cancer risk (author's transl)].
Schramm T; Jänisch W
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1981; 51(7):561-5. PubMed ID: 7337537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Amended final report on the safety assessment of glyceryl dilaurate, glyceryl diarachidate, glyceryl dibehenate, glyceryl dierucate, glyceryl dihydroxystearate, glyceryl diisopalmitate, glyceryl diisostearate, glyceryl dilinoleate, glyceryl dimyristate, glyceryl dioleate, glyceryl diricinoleate, glyceryl dipalmitate, glyceryl dipalmitoleate, glyceryl distearate, glyceryl palmitate lactate, glyceryl stearate citrate, glyceryl stearate lactate, and glyceryl stearate succinate.
Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 3():1-30. PubMed ID: 18273450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental and chemical carcinogenesis.
Wogan GN; Hecht SS; Felton JS; Conney AH; Loeb LA
Semin Cancer Biol; 2004 Dec; 14(6):473-86. PubMed ID: 15489140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Cancer--occupational exposure and genetics].
Haugen A; Ryberg D; Skaug V; Ovrebø S
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1989 May; 109(14):1529-34. PubMed ID: 2749642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
