These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical short term study of marginal integrity of resin restorations. Hansen EK; Hansen BK; Nielsen F; Olsen S; Lind K Scand J Dent Res; 1984 Aug; 92(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 6236545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of Class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restorations. Bagheri M; Ghavamnasiri M J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 18264534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage and the class V composite cavosurface. Crim GA; Mattingly SL ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 6997344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal closure of composite restorations with the gingival wall in cementum/dentin. Fusayama A; Kohno A J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Mar; 61(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 2646442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations. Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations. Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents. Santini A; Ivanovic V; Ibbetson R; Milia E Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 15478487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Replica patterns on composite restorations performed in vivo with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Qvist V; Qvist J Scand J Dent Res; 1985 Aug; 93(4):360-70. PubMed ID: 3898344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations performed in vivo with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Qvist V Scand J Dent Res; 1985 Feb; 93(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 3885380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of composite resin restorations with various etching times. Gilpatrick RO; Kaplan I; Roach D Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):573-6. PubMed ID: 7568707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Class 5 composite resin restorations: margin configurations and the distance from the CEJ. Hall LH; Cochran MA; Swartz ML Oper Dent; 1993; 18(6):246-50. PubMed ID: 8152997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of retention grooves on gingival marginal leakage in Class II posterior composite resin restorations. Ben-Amar A; Liberman R; Nordenberg D; Metzger Z J Oral Rehabil; 1988 Jul; 15(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 3171754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal leakage with different composite restorative materials in vitro. Effect of cavity design. Eriksen HM; Buonocore MG J Oral Rehabil; 1976 Oct; 3(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 789832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Van Meerbeek B; Kanumilli P; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Peumans M Dent Mater; 2005 Apr; 21(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 15766585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cavity preparation factors and microleakage of Class II composite restorations filled at intraoral temperatures. Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 10649934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]