BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7048189)

  • 1. The apical seal via the retrosurgical approach. I.A. preliminary study.
    Abdal AK; Retief DH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Jun; 53(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 7048189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The apical seal via the retrosurgical approach. II. An evaluation of retrofilling materials.
    Abdal AK; Retief DH; Jamison HC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Aug; 54(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 6214753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An in vitro evaluation of injectable thermoplasticized gutta-percha, glass ionomer, and amalgam when used as retrofilling materials.
    Olson AK; MacPherson MG; Hartwell GR; Weller RN; Kulild JC
    J Endod; 1990 Aug; 16(8):361-4. PubMed ID: 2081952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Apical root resection. Retrograde cavity preparation and retrograde root canal filling materials].
    Guldener PH
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(2):182-93. PubMed ID: 8134816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Varnishes: the effect of a second coat on apical root leakage of retrofill amalgams.
    Coen TJ; Wong M
    J Endod; 1992 Mar; 18(3):97-9. PubMed ID: 19186427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sealing quality of a newly designed root canal filling material following apicoectomy compared with amalgam and heat-sealed gutta-percha.
    Negm MM; Grant AA; Combe EC
    Int Endod J; 1982 Oct; 15(4):181-3. PubMed ID: 6764631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of apical sealing methods. A preliminary report.
    Barry GN; Heyman RA; Elias A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1975 May; 39(5):806-11. PubMed ID: 49870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the sealing properties of different retrograde techniques: an autoradiographic study.
    Szeremeta-Browar TL; VanCura JE; Zaki AE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Jan; 59(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 3883285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of glass ionomers as retrofilling materials.
    Barkhordar RA; Pelzner RB; Stark MM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Jun; 67(6):734-9. PubMed ID: 2500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of varnish and pit and fissure sealants on the sealing capacity of retrofilling techniques.
    Negm MM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Oct; 66(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 3186223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the marginal adaptation of retrograde techniques: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Tanzilli JP; Raphael D; Moodnik RM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Jul; 50(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 6994015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sealing ability of materials used as retrograde root fillings in endodontic surgery.
    Thirawat J; Edmunds DH
    Int Endod J; 1989 Nov; 22(6):295-8. PubMed ID: 2639873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the marginal leakage of retrograde techniques.
    Kaplan SD; Tanzilli JP; Raphael D; Moodnik RM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Nov; 54(5):583-5. PubMed ID: 6757826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apical sealing efficacy of two reverse filling techniques versus cold-burnished Gutta-percha.
    Shaw CS; BeGole EA; Jacobsen EL
    J Endod; 1989 Aug; 15(8):350-4. PubMed ID: 2637326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An electrochemical study of the sealing ability of different retrofilling materials.
    Alhadainy HA; Elsaed HY; Elbaghdady YM
    J Endod; 1993 Oct; 19(10):508-11. PubMed ID: 8120486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longitudinal evaluation of the seal of endodontic retrofillings.
    King KT; Anderson RW; Pashley DH; Pantera EA
    J Endod; 1990 Jul; 16(7):307-10. PubMed ID: 2081943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative sealability study of different retrofilling materials.
    Ozata F; Erdilek N; Tezel H
    Int Endod J; 1993 Jul; 26(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 8225643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 24-week study of the microleakage of four retrofilling materials using a fluid filtration method.
    Inoue S; Yoshimura M; Tinkle JS; Marshall FJ
    J Endod; 1991 Aug; 17(8):369-75. PubMed ID: 1809799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Apicoectomy surgical procedure using thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha retrofillings.
    Marlin J
    Compendium; 1990 Jan; 11(1):10, 12-4, 16-7. PubMed ID: 2376060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glass ionomer as a new retroseal in comparison with other retrofilling techniques.
    Zakhary SY
    Egypt Dent J; 1990 Jan; 36(1):81-98. PubMed ID: 2135264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.