These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7048418)

  • 1. Evaluation of a digital subtraction angiography unit.
    Cohen G; Wagner LK; Rauschkolb EN
    Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):613-7. PubMed ID: 7048418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noise analysis of a digital radiography system.
    Arnold BA; Scheibe PO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Mar; 142(3):609-13. PubMed ID: 6364749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital subtraction angiography system evaluation with phantoms.
    Wenstrup RS; Sweeney KP; Scholz FJ
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 3890013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging capability of an experimental digital subtraction angiography unit.
    MacIntyre WJ; Pavlicek W; Gallagher JH; Meaney TF; Buonocore E; Weinstein MA
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):307-13. PubMed ID: 7012923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital subtraction angiography: technology, equipment, and techniques.
    Ovitt TW; Newell JD
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 3887480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital subtraction angiography: fundamental noise characteristics.
    Balter S; Ergun D; Tscholl E; Buchmann F; Verhoeven L
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):195-8. PubMed ID: 6374758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Measurement of image-producing properties of DSA equipment].
    Busch HP; Strauss LG; Freimarck RD
    Rofo; 1984 Jul; 141(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 6431530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic and static phantoms for evaluation of digital subtraction angiographic systems.
    Fujita H; Doi K; Chan HP; Giger ML; Duda EE
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):799-803. PubMed ID: 3890012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of an ionic and a nonionic (sodium meglumine diatrizoate and iopromide) x-ray contrast medium of hemorrheology.
    Strecker EP; Stengel M; Witte S
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():24-7. PubMed ID: 2568803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of beam parameters for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Van Lysel MS
    Med Phys; 1994 Feb; 21(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 8177154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Work in progress: the application of temporal filtering techniques to hybrid subtraction in digital subtraction angiography.
    Riederer SJ; Brody WR; Enzmann DR; Hall AL; Maier JK
    Radiology; 1983 Jun; 147(3):859-62. PubMed ID: 6342036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
    Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise in stenosis measurement using digital subtraction angiography.
    Wright GA; Taylor KW; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(6):705-12. PubMed ID: 3908890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 7. Noise Wiener spectra of II-TV digital imaging systems.
    Giger ML; Doi K; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 3517612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. K-edge digital subtraction imaging with dichromatic x-ray sources: SNR and dose studies.
    Sarnelli A; Elleaume H; Taibi A; Gambaccini M; Bravin A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 51(17):4311-28. PubMed ID: 16912383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Isocon camera system in digital subtraction imaging.
    Barbaric ZL; Gomes AS; Moler CS; Nelson RS; Deckard ME
    Radiology; 1982 Jun; 143(3):783-6. PubMed ID: 7043648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Renal and hepatic tolerance of nonionic and ionic contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Langer M; Junge W; Keysser R; Hasford J; Jänicke UA
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():95-100. PubMed ID: 2568817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal injection technique for intravenous digital subtraction angiography. Animal and clinical studies of right atrial injection using small volumes (25 ml) at a high rate (35 ml/sec).
    Saddekni S; Sos TA; Sniderman KW; Srur M; Bodner LJ; Kneeland JB; Cahill PT
    Radiology; 1984 Mar; 150(3):655-9. PubMed ID: 6364203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative digital subtraction angiography: two scanning techniques for correction of scattered radiation and veiling glare. Work in progress.
    Shaw CG; Plewes DB
    Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 3898220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.