These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 704862)

  • 21. Comparison of the CT scatter fractions provided in NCRP Report No. 147 to scanner-specific scatter fractions and the consequences for calculated barrier thickness.
    Larson SC; Goodsitt MM; Christodoulou EG; Larson LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Aug; 93(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17622822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
    Koller F; Roth J
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; Zankl M; Angel E; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2583-97. PubMed ID: 17440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Clinical use of software-controlled x-ray tube modulation with "Smart-Scan" in spiral CT].
    Lehmann KJ; Wild J; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):156-8. PubMed ID: 9296614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose.
    Yilmaz MH; Albayram S; Yaşar D; Ozer H; Adaletli I; Selçuk D; Akman C; Altuğ A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 17259846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of shielding calculation methods for 16- and 64-slice computed tomography facilities.
    Moreno C; Cenizo E; Bodineau C; Mateo B; Ortega EM
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Sep; 30(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 20826895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automated computed tomography dose-saving algorithm to protect radiosensitive tissues: estimation of radiation exposure and image quality considerations.
    Ketelsen D; Buchgeister M; Fenchel M; Schmidt B; Flohr TG; Syha R; Thomas C; Tsiflikas I; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 21934513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Overranging in multisection CT: quantification and relative contribution to dose--comparison of four 16-section CT scanners.
    van der Molen AJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):208-16. PubMed ID: 17090713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of patient exposure to X-radiation from SPECT/CT scanners.
    Hara N; Onoguchi M; Takenaka K; Matsubara K; Ujita H; Kenko Y
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2010 Sep; 38(3):138-48. PubMed ID: 20807855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
    Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Radiation-exposure studies of CT diagnosis with the standard and spiral technics].
    Langkowski JH; Pogoda P; Hess A
    Rofo; 1994 Jul; 161(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 8043761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Normalized pediatric organ-absorbed doses from CT examinations.
    Fearon T; Vucich J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jan; 148(1):171-4. PubMed ID: 3491508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiation shielding implications of computed tomography scatter exposure to the floor.
    Langer SG; Gray JE
    Health Phys; 1998 Aug; 75(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 9685075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiation protection requirements for a whole-body CT scanner.
    Gross GP; McCullough EC
    Radiology; 1977 Mar; 122(3):825-6. PubMed ID: 841080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Eye lens dose in cranial computed tomography with reference to the technical development of CT scanners.
    Moström U; Ytterbergh C; Bergström K
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1986; 27(5):599-606. PubMed ID: 3799235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measurements of computed tomography radiation scatter.
    Van Every B; Petty RJ
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1992 Mar; 15(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 1575645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Why Does Patient Dose Increase With Tube Energy in CT When It Does the Opposite in Radiography?
    Ritenour ER
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 205(1):W1. PubMed ID: 26102405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of different methods for shielding design in computed tomography.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O; Arandjic D; Kosutic D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):133-6. PubMed ID: 21743070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiation dose in neurological computed tomographic scanning.
    Whitmore RC; Bushong SC; Archer BA; Glaze SA
    Radiol Technol; 1979; 51(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 472223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Half value layer measurements to facilitate patient dose assessment for newer CT scanners using published normalized dose data.
    Hill AL
    Br J Radiol; 1999 Aug; 72(860):792-8. PubMed ID: 10624346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.