These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 704868)

  • 1. A comparison of five methods for monitoring the precision of automated x-ray film processors.
    Nickoloff EL; Leo F; Reese M
    Radiology; 1978 Nov; 129(2):509-14. PubMed ID: 704868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of poor control of film processors on mammographic image quality.
    Kimme-Smith C; Sun H; Bassett LW; Gold RH
    Radiographics; 1992 Nov; 12(6):1137-46. PubMed ID: 1439016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of light and x-ray sensitometric responses of double-emulsion films for different processing conditions.
    Blendl C; Buhr E
    Med Phys; 2001 Dec; 28(12):2420-6. PubMed ID: 11797944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Checking the consistency of sensitometers and film processors in a mammographic screening programme.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Feb; 69(818):143-7. PubMed ID: 8785642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitometric responses of selected medical radiographic films.
    Kofler JM; Gray JE
    Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):879-83. PubMed ID: 1947114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality control of the automatic processor.
    Legg LM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Feb; 22(2):135-8, 140-2; quiz 144. PubMed ID: 11911065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammography film processor replenishment rate: bromide level monitoring.
    Kimme-Smith C; Wuelfing P; Kitts EL; Cagnon C; Basic M; Bassett L
    Med Phys; 1997 Mar; 24(3):369-72. PubMed ID: 9089588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the "STEP Test" to evaluate processing speed in Moroccan hospitals.
    Nfaoiu K; Bentayeb F; Basraoui O; Azevedo AC
    Phys Med; 2010; 26(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 19963422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quality assurance through constancy control for x-ray film processors (author's transl)].
    Weberling R
    Rontgenblatter; 1982 Jun; 35(6):248-54. PubMed ID: 7089438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Centralized, automated chemical-delivery system.
    Wiesen EJ; Kilmo RE; Bellon EM
    Radiology; 1981 Aug; 140(2):522-3. PubMed ID: 7255734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A mammography quality assurance test program.
    Burgess A
    Radiology; 1979 Nov; 133(2):491-5. PubMed ID: 493542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Problems associated with simulated light sensitometry for low-crossover medical x-ray films.
    Haus AG; Dickerson RE
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 2215416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M; Adliene D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Features of the maintenance of automated developing machines].
    Koveshnikov AI
    Med Tekh; 1999; (2):28-33. PubMed ID: 10335507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of mammographic film processor performance in a hospital and mobile screening unit.
    Murray JG; Dowsett DJ; Laird O; Ennis JT
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Dec; 65(780):1097-101. PubMed ID: 1286417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variation of the sensitometric characteristics of seven mammographic films with processing conditions.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Dimakopoulou AD; Koulentianos ED; Serefoglou AN; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):666-71. PubMed ID: 15326045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Sensitometric characteristics of medical roentgenographic and fluorographic films. Sensitivity of the amplifying screens combined with a film].
    Gurvich AM; Erofeeva ND; Katomina RV; Maslov LA
    Med Tekh; 1976; (2):17-22. PubMed ID: 1030760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitometric control of roentgen film processors.
    Forsberg H
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 2958043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flood replenishment: a new method of processor control.
    Frank ED; Gray JE; Wilken DA
    Radiol Technol; 1980; 52(3):271-5. PubMed ID: 7280210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of pH monitoring as a method of processor control.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Winkler NT
    Radiol Technol; 1979; 50(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 37551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.