147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7049154)
1. A randomised trial and a comparative study of the copper 7 200 and the multiload copper 250 intrauterine devices.
Wilson J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Feb; 22(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 7049154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three different models of the copper T intrauterine contraceptive device.
Roy S; Casagrande J; Cooper DL; Mishell DR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jul; 134(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 453297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of the TCu 380Ag and the Multiload Cu375.
Cole LP; Potts DM; Aranda C; Behlilovic B; Etman ES; Moreno J; Randic L
Fertil Steril; 1985 Feb; 43(2):214-7. PubMed ID: 3881295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do insertion-related problems affect subsequent IUD performance?
Chi IC; Waszak CS; Wilkens LR
Contraception; 1986 Nov; 34(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 3816233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrauterine contraception with Nova-T and copper-T-200 during three years.
Nygren KG; Nielsen NC; Pyörälä T; Allonen H; Luukkainen T
Contraception; 1981 Nov; 24(5):529-42. PubMed ID: 7032839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective randomized comparative trial of the Gravigard, Latex Leaf, Dalkon Shield and Multiload Cu 250 IUDs.
McCarthy TG; Chew SC; Lim SM; Cheng MC; Ratnam SS
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Aug; 26(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 3545173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five years' experience of intrauterine contraception with the Nova-T and the Copper-T-200.
Luukkainen T; Allonen H; Nielsen NC; Nygren KG; Pyörälä T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Dec; 147(8):885-92. PubMed ID: 6650625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical study comparing the performance of three IUCDs (Multiload Copper 250, Copper T 200, and Lippes Loop C).
Fakhr MM; Fakhr DM; Hassan AA; Nasser NM
Popul Sci; 1988; 8():39-53. PubMed ID: 12316112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of the levonorgestrel-releasing IUD: its advantages and disadvantages when compared to the copper-releasing IUDs.
Chi IC
Contraception; 1991 Dec; 44(6):573-88. PubMed ID: 1773615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experience with the copper 7 intrauterine device in an adolescent population.
Kulig JW; Rauh JL; Burket RL; Cabot HM; Brookman RR
J Pediatr; 1980 Apr; 96(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 7359288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Twelve-month comparative multicenter study of the TCu 380A and ML 250 intrauterine devices in Bangkok, Thailand.
Reinprayoon D; Gilmore C; Farr G; Amatya R
Contraception; 1998 Oct; 58(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 9865999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical trial of the Delta-T intrauterine device: immediate postpartum insertion.
Brenner PF
Contraception; 1983 Aug; 28(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 6357630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devices.
Sivin I; Stern J; Diaz J; Diaz MM; Faundes A; el Mahgoub S; Diaz S; Pavez M; Coutinho E; Mattos CE
Contraception; 1987 Mar; 35(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 3111785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two years' experience with two levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and one copper-releasing intrauterine device: a randomized comparative performance study.
Nilsson CG; Allonen H; Diaz J; Luukkainen T
Fertil Steril; 1983 Feb; 39(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 6401636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Four years of a comparative study with Nova T and Copper T 200 IUDS.
Nielsen NC; Pyörälä T; Allonen H; Nygren KG; Luukkainen T
Contraception; 1982 Jul; 26(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 7128132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Interval iud insertion in parous women: a randomized multicentre comparative trial of the Lippes Loop D, TCu220c and the Copper 7.
Contraception; 1982 Jul; 26(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 7128130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of copper T-200 with Lippes loop as a contraceptive device.
Wright EA; Aisien OA
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Jun; 29(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 2568294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One-year clinical experience with FlexiGard.
Batar I
Contraception; 1992 Oct; 46(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 1486769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Five years private practice experience of nulliparous women using copper IUD's.
Smith RP; Goresky DM; Etchell DM
Contraception; 1980 Apr; 21(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 7389354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
