BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7049907)

  • 1. Cell populations in leucocyte adherence inhibition: requirement for T lymphocytes with IgG Fc receptors.
    Powell AE; Birch RE; Murrell H; Sloss AM
    Immunology; 1982 Aug; 46(4):689-96. PubMed ID: 7049907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Antigenic specificity and cellular mechanisms in leukocyte adherence inhibition analysis of immunity to simple proteins and hapten-protein conjugates.
    Powell A; Sloss AM; Smith RN; Murrell H
    Cancer Res; 1979 Feb; 39(2 Pt 2):570-5. PubMed ID: 83911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. TG cell involvement in the leukocyte adherence inhibition phenomenon.
    Taylor SG; Saffold PC; Braun DP; Harris JE
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1982 Apr; 68(4):549-54. PubMed ID: 6978424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Leukocyte-adherence inhibition: a specific assay of cell-mediated immunity dependent on lymphokine-mediated collaboration between T lymphocytes.
    Powell AE; Sloss AM; Smith RN
    J Immunol; 1978 Jun; 120(6):1957-66. PubMed ID: 77883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Formation of IgE-binding factors by rat T lymphocytes. VI. Cellular mechanisms for the formation of IgE-potentiating factor and IgE-suppressive factor by antigenic stimulation of antigen-primed spleen cells.
    Uede T; Ishizaka K
    J Immunol; 1982 Oct; 129(4):1391-7. PubMed ID: 6980933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. IgE Fc receptor positive T and B lymphocytes in patients with the hyper IgE syndrome.
    Thompson LF; Spiegelberg HL; Buckley RH
    Clin Exp Immunol; 1985 Jan; 59(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 3882288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Micromodification of the leukocyte adherence inhibition test for cancer patients].
    Kharkevich DD; Tabagari DZ; Savinov AIu
    Vopr Onkol; 1985; 31(7):17-21. PubMed ID: 3895734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of the adaptive immune response following immunization in pregnant sows (Sus scrofa) kept in two different housing systems.
    Grün V; Schmucker S; Schalk C; Flauger B; Stefanski V
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3388-97. PubMed ID: 24948651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Participation of IL-4 in the formation of IgD-binding factors by antigen-primed mouse spleen cells.
    Adachi M; Arai N; Ishizaka K
    J Immunol; 1988 Oct; 141(7):2358-66. PubMed ID: 3262659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the haemocytometer and tube modifications of the leucocyte adherence inhibition assay.
    Holán V; Schimke R; Ambrosius H; Hasek M
    Folia Biol (Praha); 1981; 27(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 6162681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Keyhole limpet hemocyanin-propagated Peyer's patch T cell clones that help IgA responses.
    Maghazachi AA; Phillips-Quagliata JM
    J Immunol; 1988 May; 140(10):3380-8. PubMed ID: 3283231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of the indirect tube LAI assay in the study of cell-mediated immunity in rats immunized with B77 tumor cells.
    Kalafut F; Hung PM; Novotná L; Klobusická M
    Neoplasma; 1980; 27(5):525-31. PubMed ID: 7015159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuraminidase- and trypsin-induced exposure to membrane receptors for IgG and IgM molecules on human peripheral blood lymphocytes.
    Haegert DG
    Clin Exp Immunol; 1977 Sep; 29(3):457-63. PubMed ID: 303965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Double-rosetting technique for the detection of Fc gamma receptor-positive T lymphocytes.
    Cillari E; Di Gesu G; Palmeri S; Lio D; Salerno A; Li Voti P; La Via MF
    Diagn Immunol; 1983; 1(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 6238747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulation of antigen-specific T- and B-cell memory in local as well as systemic lymphoid tissues following oral immunization with cholera toxin adjuvant.
    Vajdy M; Lycke N
    Immunology; 1993 Oct; 80(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 7505255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cellular immunity in pregnancy: subpopulations of T lymphocytes bearing Fc receptors for IgG and IgM in pregnant women.
    Hirahara F; Gorai I; Tanaka K; Matsuzaki Y; Sumiyoshi Y; Shiojima Y
    Clin Exp Immunol; 1980 Aug; 41(2):353-7. PubMed ID: 6969153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. T cell hybridomas coexpressing Fc receptors (FcR) for different isotypes. II. IgA-induced formation of suppressive IgA binding factor(s) by a murine T hybridoma bearing Fc gamma R and Fc alpha R.
    Yodoi J; Adachi M; Teshigawara K; Miyamainaba M; Masuda T; Fridman WH
    J Immunol; 1983 Jul; 131(1):303-10. PubMed ID: 6223074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Specificity of tumor antigen recognition by T-lymphocytes in the leukocyte adherence inhibition (LAI) assay in patients with breast cancer.
    Tsang PH; Holland JF; Bekesi JG
    J Clin Lab Immunol; 1982 Dec; 9(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 6762442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the mechanism of the leukocyte adherence inhibition test.
    Tong AW; Burger DR; Finke P; Barney C; Vandenbark AA; Vetto RM
    Cancer Res; 1979 Feb; 39(2 Pt 2):597-603. PubMed ID: 367586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Mechanisms, kinetics and specificity of the leukocyte adherence inhibition test in breast cancer].
    Kharkevich DD; Polevaia EB; Derevnina NA; Sablikova IuA; Savinov AIu
    Eksp Onkol; 1985; 7(6):69-73. PubMed ID: 3910405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.