These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7050808)
21. Comparison of the effect of three suturing techniques on postkeratoplasty astigmatism in keratoconus. Javadi MA; Naderi M; Zare M; Jenaban A; Rabei HM; Anissian A Cornea; 2006 Oct; 25(9):1029-33. PubMed ID: 17133048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Different suturing techniques variously affect the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Busin M; Mönks T; al-Nawaiseh I Ophthalmology; 1998 Jul; 105(7):1200-5. PubMed ID: 9663222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Globe rupture following penetrating keratoplasty: how often, why, and what can we do to prevent it? Elder MJ; Stack RR Cornea; 2004 Nov; 23(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 15502477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Experiments on animals to investigate the suitability of perforating corneal sutures (author's transl)]. Puder R; Goede H Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1975 Sep; 167(3):434-6. PubMed ID: 765607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Effect of adjustment of corneal running sutures on cylindrical refraction after perforating keratoplasty]. Urminský J; Rozsíval P; Lorencová V; Jirásková N Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2004 Apr; 60(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 15185451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Inadequacy of a polyester (Mersilene) suture for the reduction of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty. Bertram BA; Drews C; Gemmill M; Guell J; Murad M; Waring GO Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1990; 88():237-49; discussion 249-54. PubMed ID: 2095023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effect of 10-0 running nylon versus 8-0 silk on the healing of corneal gragts. Gasset AR; Bellows RT; Holtmann HW; Gravenstein N Ann Ophthalmol; 1976 Jan; 8(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 1108736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Corneal wound dehiscence after penetrating keratoplasty. Das S; Whiting M; Taylor HR Cornea; 2007 Jun; 26(5):526-9. PubMed ID: 17525644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Retrospective analysis of deep lamellar keratoplasties]. Bodenmueller M; Goldblum D; Frueh BE Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 May; 221(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 15162268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Changes in corneal power and refraction due to sequential suture removal following nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with keratoconus. Langenbucher A; Seitz B Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Feb; 141(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 16458682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Replacing the endothelium without corneal surface incisions or sutures: the first United States clinical series using the deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty procedure. Terry MA; Ousley PJ Ophthalmology; 2003 Apr; 110(4):755-64; discussion 764. PubMed ID: 12689898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Corneal topography-guided penetrating keratoplasty and suture adjustment: new approach for astigmatism control. Vinciguerra P; Epstein D; Albè E; Spada F; Incarnato N; Orzalesi N; Rosetta P Cornea; 2007 Jul; 26(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 17592315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk factors for the first episode of corneal graft rejection in keratoconus. Epstein AJ; de Castro TN; Laibson PR; Cohen EJ; Rapuano CJ Cornea; 2006 Oct; 25(9):1005-11. PubMed ID: 17133044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The efficacy of a single continuous nylon suture for control of post keratoplasty astigmatism. Van Meter W Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1996; 94():1157-80. PubMed ID: 8981721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Should the suture be removed after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus?]. J Fr Ophtalmol; 1994; 17(2):150-2. PubMed ID: 8176188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]