These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Evaluation of the cost effectiveness and quality of hospital treatment: the American Medicare Peer Review Organization model]. Kersting T; Eichhorn S Chirurg; 1994 Nov; 65(11):suppl 235-41. PubMed ID: 7821056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A patient care review model to suit both hospitals and PSROs. Thompson RE Hospitals; 1980 Aug; 54(16):61-3. PubMed ID: 7190542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The medical community looks at review. Murchison GC Ala J Med Sci; 1985 Oct; 22(4):407-9. PubMed ID: 4073392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. PSROs and cost containment: a cautious perspective. Shapiro RJ QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1979 Dec; 5(12):16-8. PubMed ID: 121393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. PSROs score their first success in cutting costs. Snyder JD; Crawford JB Physicians Manage; 1979 Mar; 19(3):57-9. PubMed ID: 10297395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost containment and the link to quality. VanderVeen LM Health Care Strateg Manage; 1988 Jan; 6(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 10286008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I. Politser P Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The future of utilization management/review. Delaney A QRC Advis; 1993 Oct; 9(12):1-4. PubMed ID: 10128862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The new economics of PSRO review: an uncertain future. Luecke RW; Freeman JK Hosp Financ Manage; 1981 Apr; 35(4):56-8, 60, 62. PubMed ID: 10273247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HSAs and PSROs: can the odd couple learn to live together? Budetti PP Am J Health Plann; 1978 Jan; 3(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10305961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PSROs: their current status and their impact to date. Dobson A; Greer JG; Carlson RH; Davis FA; Kucken LE; Steinhardt BJ; Ferry TP; Adler GS Inquiry; 1978 Jun; 15(2):113-28. PubMed ID: 149760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. New developments at the Connecticut Peer Review Organization. Meehan TP Conn Med; 1993 Aug; 57(8):533-5. PubMed ID: 8243082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Privately initiated assurance programs: the insurance industry's role. Moorefield JL Bull N Y Acad Med; 1982; 58(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 6956395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The economics of delegated vs. nondelegated PSRO review. Luecke RW Hosp Financ Manage; 1980 Jul; 34(7):24-30. PubMed ID: 10273228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospitals and PSROs: can quality compete with cost? Schumacher DN QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1981 Nov; 7(11):2-3. PubMed ID: 6801571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. PRO objectives and quality criteria. Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA Hospitals; 1985 Feb; 59(3):64-7. PubMed ID: 3881333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]