These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7052299)

  • 1. [2 discrete models of similarity structures compared: the hierarchical and the additive cluster model].
    Eckes T
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1981-1982; 134(4):281-302. PubMed ID: 7052299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Similarity effects in face recognition.
    Davies GM; Shepherd JW; Ellis HD
    Am J Psychol; 1979 Sep; 92(3):507-23. PubMed ID: 517679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Significance of functional hemispheric asymmetries in the visual area, detected by tachistoscopic visual half-field stimulation. Attempt at differentiation of the results of a trial series in children of elementary school age using a cluster analytic method].
    Spiel G; Kral G
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1986; 33(2):254-77. PubMed ID: 3705631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Object identification in the hierarchy of artificial concept].
    Hoffmann J; Ziessler C
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1983; 191(2):135-67. PubMed ID: 6137912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition.
    Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1194-209. PubMed ID: 14622055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Letter perception: from pixels to pandemonium.
    Grainger J; Rey A; Dufau S
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 Oct; 12(10):381-7. PubMed ID: 18760658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for an age-independent process in category learning.
    Livingston KR; Andrews JK
    Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15985065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Similarity and discrimination learning in humans.
    Noguera M; Grau M; Peris JM; Barbería I; Chamizo VD
    Behav Processes; 2008 Oct; 79(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 18619526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multimodal similarity and categorization of novel, three-dimensional objects.
    Cooke T; Jäkel F; Wallraven C; Bülthoff HH
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 16580027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Coordinate transformations in object recognition.
    Graf M
    Psychol Bull; 2006 Nov; 132(6):920-45. PubMed ID: 17073527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison processes in category learning: from theory to behavior.
    Hammer R; Bar-Hillel A; Hertz T; Weinshall D; Hochstein S
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1225():102-18. PubMed ID: 18614160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Aug; 51(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 16039934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The representation of perceived shape similarity and its role for category learning in monkeys: a modeling study.
    Op de Beeck HP; Wagemans J; Vogels R
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):598-610. PubMed ID: 18199467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect.
    Paap KR; Newsome SL; McDonald JE; Schvaneveldt RW
    Psychol Rev; 1982 Sep; 89(5):573-94. PubMed ID: 7178333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recency effects as a window to generalization: separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning.
    Jones M; Love BC; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):316-32. PubMed ID: 16569149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of animal recognition: a difference between Parts and Wholes.
    Davidoff J; Roberson D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Mar; 81(3):217-34. PubMed ID: 11884088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of stimulus variability on overgeneralization and overdiscrimination errors in children and adults.
    Novack TA; Richman CL
    Child Dev; 1980 Mar; 51(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 7363748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Geometric demonstration of clustering in free recall data].
    Geyer M
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1984; 136(4):269-80. PubMed ID: 6535533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: "category-specific" neuropsychological deficits.
    Humphreys GW; Forde EM
    Behav Brain Sci; 2001 Jun; 24(3):453-76; discussion 476-509. PubMed ID: 11682799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.