These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7052802)

  • 1. Practice effects for normal listeners' performance on a nonsense syllable test.
    Edgerton BJ; Danhauer JL; Rizzo S
    J Aud Res; 1981 Apr; 21(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 7052802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Part- vs full-list performance on the NST by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
    Danhauer JL; Brink TJ
    J Aud Res; 1985 Jul; 25(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 3842838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance on a nonsense syllable test for normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Danhauer JL; Hiller SM; Edgerton BJ
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jul; 24(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 6545536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing-impaired children's performance on the Edgerton and Danhauer Nonsense Syllable Test.
    Danhauer JL; Johnson C; Asp CW
    J Aud Res; 1984 Oct; 24(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 6545891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech discrimination scores at low sensation levels as a possible index of malingering.
    Gold S; Lubinsky R; Shahar A
    J Aud Res; 1981 Apr; 21(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 7052804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical models for predicting Edgerton-Danhauer NST scores from pure-tone thresholds.
    Danhauer JL; Sahley TL; Abdala C
    J Aud Res; 1986 Jul; 26(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 3680145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bisensory vs summed-unisensory improvement on two speech-reception tasks.
    Wilhite A; Dancer JE; Rozema H
    J Aud Res; 1986 Oct; 26(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 3436927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Older persons' performance on auditory, visual, and auditory-visual presentations of the Edgerton and Danhauer Nonsense Syllable Test.
    Danhauer JL; Garnett CM; Edgerton BJ
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 4043572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of synthetic speech sounds by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Godfrey JJ; Millay KK
    J Aud Res; 1980 Jul; 20(3):187-203. PubMed ID: 7347740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands.
    van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):348-55. PubMed ID: 18569107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children's performance on multidimensionally scored time-compressed sentential stimuli.
    Riensche LL; Ginn RI; Porch BE
    J Aud Res; 1985 Oct; 25(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 3843097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal-hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kewley-Port D; Burkle TZ; Lee JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2365-75. PubMed ID: 17902871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infant-adult differences in unmasked thresholds for the discrimination of consonant-vowel syllable pairs.
    Nozza RJ; Rossman RN; Bond LC
    Audiology; 1991; 30(2):102-12. PubMed ID: 1877897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Time-compressed spondaic words as a measure of speech reception threshold.
    Foltner KA; Beasley DS; White SC
    J Aud Res; 1979 Oct; 19(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 262461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.