BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7052934)

  • 1. Legal "rites": criminalizing the mentally ill.
    Treffert DA
    Hillside J Clin Psychiatry; 1981; 3(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 7052934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Arrest and incarceration of civil commitment candidates.
    Hiday VA
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1991 Jul; 42(7):729-34. PubMed ID: 1885184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening services in civil commitment of the mentally ill: an attempt to balance individual liberties with needs for treatment.
    Aviram U
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 8364237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Civil commitment and the criminal insanity plea in Israeli law.
    Toib JA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(4):308-18. PubMed ID: 18374417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme Court rulings in two cases broaden legal protections for mentally ill criminal defendants.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1992 Jul; 43(7):752-3. PubMed ID: 1355462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rights of the patient vs. rights of the public in the "Treatment of the Mentally Ill Law--1991".
    Bazak J
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1995; 32(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 7558765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of civil patients and incompetent defendants: pre and post deinstitutionalization.
    Arvanites TM
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(4):393-403. PubMed ID: 2289029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of the right to refuse treatment in a forensic patient population: six-month review.
    Miller RD; Bernstein MR; Van Rybroek GJ; Maier GJ
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 2758115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.
    Ladds B; Convit A; Zito J; Vitrai J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(4):529-45. PubMed ID: 7914440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The involuntary civil commitment of mentally ill persons in the United States and Romania: a comparative analysis.
    Loue S
    Rev Rom Bioet; 2003; 1(1):55-88. PubMed ID: 15011669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Competency courts: a creative solution for restoring competency to the competency process.
    Finkle MJ; Kurth R; Cadle C; Mullan J
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):767-86. PubMed ID: 19784943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of the patients deemed not guilty by reason of insanity for the psychiatric reform.
    Douzenis A
    Psychiatriki; 2016; 27(3):165-168. PubMed ID: 27837570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incompetency to stand trial and mental health treatment: a case study testing the subversion hypothesis.
    Hochstedler Steury E; Choinski M; Steury SR
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996; 24(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 8889132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill.
    Neff RC
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The legal aspects of conditional release in the criminal and civil court system.
    Weinstein NM
    Behav Sci Law; 2014 Sep; 32(5):666-80. PubMed ID: 25328072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Law and psychiatry: Scandinavia in the 1980s.
    Ojesjö L
    Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci; 1986 Mar; (484):144-54. PubMed ID: 10276572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
    Cobun LS
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of the insanity defense as a jail diversion mechanism for mentally ill persons charged with misdemeanors.
    Schaefer MN; Bloom JD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 15809243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The civil liability for damages of the criminally insane.
    Melamed Y; Ganot N; Mester R; Bleich A
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2008; 45(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 19439834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.