These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7053403)

  • 21. The effects of task-relevant saccadic eye movements performed during the encoding of a serial sequence on visuospatial memory performance.
    Martin L; Tapper A; Gonzalez DA; Leclerc M; Niechwiej-Szwedo E
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1519-1529. PubMed ID: 28251336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Processing consequences of perceptual grouping in selective attention.
    Farkas MS; Hoyer WJ
    J Gerontol; 1980 Mar; 35(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 7410778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Judgements of relative direction: the effect of task instructions on spatial recall.
    Donaldson P; Tlauka M; Robertson C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jun; 66(6):1090-103. PubMed ID: 23057609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of semantic relationships on older adult map memory.
    Thomas AK; Bonura BM; Taylor HA
    Psychol Aging; 2012 Sep; 27(3):657-65. PubMed ID: 22612602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. No sex differences in spatial location memory for abstract designs.
    Rahman Q; Bakare M; Serinsu C
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Jun; 76(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 21459502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial perspective-taking ability in young and elderly adults.
    Ohta RJ; Walsh DA; Krauss IK
    Exp Aging Res; 1981; 7(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 7238550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Environment learning using descriptions or navigation: The involvement of working memory in young and older adults.
    Meneghetti C; Borella E; Carbone E; Martinelli M; De Beni R
    Br J Psychol; 2016 May; 107(2):259-80. PubMed ID: 26280566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial location and pathway memory compared in the reaching vs. walking domains.
    Piccardi L; Bianchini F; Nori R; Marano A; Iachini F; Lasala L; Guariglia C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Apr; 566():226-30. PubMed ID: 24631564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Age-related differences in spatial memory: effects of structural and organizational context.
    Cherry KE; Jones MW
    J Gen Psychol; 1999 Jan; 126(1):53-73. PubMed ID: 10216969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Map Learning in Normal Aging: The Role of Individual Visuo-Spatial Abilities and Implications.
    Meneghetti C; Muffato V; Borella E; De Beni R
    Curr Alzheimer Res; 2018; 15(3):205-218. PubMed ID: 29086697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of adult age differences in verbal and visuo-spatial memory: the importance of 'pure', parallel and validated measures.
    Kemps E; Newson R
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2006 Apr; 28(3):341-56. PubMed ID: 16618624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cognitive operations on space and their impact on the precision of location memory.
    Lansdale M; Humphries J; Flynn V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1501-19. PubMed ID: 23506139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Learning virtual routes: what does verbal coding do in working memory?].
    Gyselinck V; Grison É; Gras D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 25730644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attention, awareness of contingencies, and control in spatial localization: a qualitative difference approach.
    Vaquero JM; Fiacconi C; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1342-57. PubMed ID: 21038991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. No advantage for remembering horizontal over vertical spatial locations learned from a single viewpoint.
    Hinterecker T; Leroy C; Zhao M; Butz MV; Bülthoff HH; Meilinger T
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):158-171. PubMed ID: 28875474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Task-irrelevant distractors in the delay period interfere selectively with visual short-term memory for spatial locations.
    Marini F; Scott J; Aron AR; Ester EF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1384-1392. PubMed ID: 28439791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: a study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts.
    De Goede M; Postma A
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 17950509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Egocentric and allocentric spatial memory in healthy aging: performance on real-world tasks.
    Fernandez-Baizan C; Diaz-Caceres E; Arias JL; Mendez M
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2019; 52(4):e8041. PubMed ID: 30994731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Short-term fluctuations in elderly people's sensorimotor functioning predict text and spatial memory performance: The Macarthur Successful Aging Studies.
    Li S; Aggen SH; Nesselroade JR; Baltes PB
    Gerontology; 2001; 47(2):100-16. PubMed ID: 11287736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations from childhood to elderly age.
    Ruggiero G; D'Errico O; Iachini T
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):259-72. PubMed ID: 25805435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.