These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 705354)

  • 1. Audio-ocular response characteristics.
    Zahn JR; Abel LA; Dell'Osso LF
    Sens Processes; 1978 Mar; 2(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 705354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eye and head movements to visual and auditory targets.
    Siegmund H; Stoppa M; Santibáñez G
    Act Nerv Super (Praha); 1987 Jun; 29(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 3661101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Audio-ocular response: saccadic programming.
    Traccis S; Abel LA; Dell'Osso LF
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1984 Aug; 55(8):735-9. PubMed ID: 6487211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporal characteristics of saccadic eye movements induced by auditory stimuli.
    LaCroix TP; Enderle JD; Engelken EJ
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1990; 26():67-77. PubMed ID: 2334782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Saccadic eye movements in response to visual, auditory, and bisensory stimuli.
    Engelken EJ; Stevens KW
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1989 Aug; 60(8):762-8. PubMed ID: 2775132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous auditory stimuli shorten saccade latencies.
    Konrad HR; Rea C; Olin B; Colliver J
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Dec; 99(12):1230-2. PubMed ID: 2601535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binocular coordination in fore/aft motion.
    Ramat S; Zee DS
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Apr; 1039():36-53. PubMed ID: 15826960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of aging on saccadic eye movements to visual and auditory targets.
    Schik G; Mohr S; Hofferberth B
    Int Tinnitus J; 2000; 6(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 14689634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crossmodal integration in the primate superior colliculus underlying the preparation and initiation of saccadic eye movements.
    Bell AH; Meredith MA; Van Opstal AJ; Munoz DP
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 93(6):3659-73. PubMed ID: 15703222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The audioocular response: intersensory delay.
    Zahn JR; Abel LA; Dell 'Osso LF; Daroff RB
    Sens Processes; 1979 Mar; 3(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 515741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationships between manual reaction time and saccade latency in response to visual and auditory stimuli.
    Engelken EJ; Stevens KW; Enderle JD
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1991 Apr; 62(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 2031632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The main sequence of human optokinetic afternystagmus (OKAN).
    Kaminiarz A; Königs K; Bremmer F
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Jun; 101(6):2889-97. PubMed ID: 19297517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audio-visual stimulation improves oculomotor patterns in patients with hemianopia.
    Passamonti C; Bertini C; Làdavas E
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):546-55. PubMed ID: 18983860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual search improvement in hemianopic patients after audio-visual stimulation.
    Bolognini N; Rasi F; Coccia M; Làdavas E
    Brain; 2005 Dec; 128(Pt 12):2830-42. PubMed ID: 16219672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural latencies do not explain the auditory and audio-visual flash-lag effect.
    Arrighi R; Alais D; Burr D
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(23):2917-25. PubMed ID: 16115662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined auditory and visual stimuli facilitate head saccades in the barn owl (Tyto alba).
    Whitchurch EA; Takahashi TT
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 96(2):730-45. PubMed ID: 16672296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surprise, surprise: two distinct components in the visually evoked distractor effect.
    Graupner ST; Velichkovsky BM; Pannasch S; Marx J
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Mar; 44(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 17343709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: a behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Boll S; Berti S
    Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):645-54. PubMed ID: 19386054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related potentials to visual, auditory, and bimodal (combined auditory-visual) stimuli.
    Isoğlu-Alkaç U; Kedzior K; Keskindemirci G; Ermutlu N; Karamursel S
    Int J Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 117(2):259-73. PubMed ID: 17365112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.