350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7054153)
1. Involuntary admission--a century of experience.
Schwartz L
J Clin Psychiatry; 1982 Jan; 43(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 7054153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to refuse treatment and the abolition of involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill.
Tanay E
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 7225582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Recent developments in mental health law.
Perlin ML
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1983 Dec; 6(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 6664902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal rights of mental patients.
Bernstein AH
Hospitals; 1979 Mar; 53(5):49-52, 92. PubMed ID: 759339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right to refuse treatment: legal issues.
Wing KR
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977; 5(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 912115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The case of Tim Crawford: mental health legislation five years later.
Page S
Leg Med Q; 1978 Mar; 2(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 10249100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Changing laws and ethics in psychiatry.
Sadoff RL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977; 5(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 912118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Act 817 of 1979: Arkansas' new involuntary commitment law.
Faulkner LR
J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Apr; 76(11):457-63. PubMed ID: 6445353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Has the Pennsylvania legislature over-reacted in setting standards for involuntary commitment of mentally ill persons.
Rothman DA; Rothman NL
Pa Nurse; 1978 Feb; 33(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 247270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Decade of litigation has led to redefinition of patients' rights.
Weiner BA
Hospitals; 1981 May; 55(9):67-70. PubMed ID: 7216209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in the law have improved treatment of the mentally ill.
Sadoff RL
Hospitals; 1981 May; 55(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 7216207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Compulsion under Part IV of the Mental Health Act of 1959.
Davis DR
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1979; 2(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 521200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Compulsory commitment of the mentally ill: a study of the English law.
Menza AJ
State Gov; 1977; 50(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 10297091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Family opposition to psychiatric treatment: a medicolegal dilemma.
Sparr LF; Roth LH
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 6850107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Advocacy and the mentally ill.
Willetts R
Soc Work; 1980 Sep; 25(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 10248421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The hostility of the burger court to mental health law reform litigation.
Brant J
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 6850110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The ethical dilemmas of forensic psychiatry: a utilitarian approach.
Halleck SL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 6478070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The law and the mentally incompetent.
Leahy ML; Barnes M
Public Welf; 1978; 36(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10294858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. President's message: The most beneficial alternative: a counterpoint to the least restrictive alternative.
Perr IN
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1978; 6(4):iv-vii. PubMed ID: 752375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Competency determinations.
Beck JC
Am J Psychiatry; 1988 Oct; 145(10):1325-6. PubMed ID: 3421374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]