These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7054708)

  • 1. Bakke decision revisited.
    N Engl J Med; 1982 Feb; 306(5):306-7. PubMed ID: 7054708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bakke: not a black and white decision.
    Looney WF
    Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Aug; 6(8):37-40. PubMed ID: 703479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sounding Boards. Three years after Bakke: a reaffirmation.
    Fitzgerald FT
    N Engl J Med; 1981 Oct; 305(15):886-7. PubMed ID: 7278887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The University of California v. Bakke: a murky future.
    Bork RH
    Regulation; 1978; 2(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 10238569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The University of California v. Bakke: conversation with a dean of admissions.
    Marshall B
    Regulation; 1978; 2(5):39. PubMed ID: 10238570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The University of California v. Bakke: the court's three decisions.
    Sindler AP
    Regulation; 1978; 2(5):15-23. PubMed ID: 10238565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bakke vs. Univ. of California: pure and simple..
    Johnson ET
    Urban Health; 1977 Apr; 6(3):6. PubMed ID: 10235887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Affirmative action in medical school admissions.
    Cohen C
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1981; 76():17-38. PubMed ID: 7335661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke: must medical school admissions programs be "color-blind"?
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1977 Nov; 66(11):907-8. PubMed ID: 925541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minority admissions: the increasingly empty promise of affirmative action.
    Gapen P
    New Physician; 1979; 28(7):20-6. PubMed ID: 10243299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implications of the Bakke decision for veterinary college admissions.
    Andberg WL
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1979 Jan; 174(1):97-100. PubMed ID: 378920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Letter: Reverse discrimination.
    Evans TE
    J Med Educ; 1976 Jan; 51(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 1246073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Admissions to medical school: refining the issues.
    Stimmel B
    Mt Sinai J Med; 1978; 45(6):754-66. PubMed ID: 310956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should Bakke win?
    Mode AS
    Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 May; 6(5):6. PubMed ID: 703474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical school admissions: applicant projections revisited.
    McRae DJ
    J Med Educ; 1978 Jul; 53(7):612-4. PubMed ID: 671512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Bakke case and 'reverse discrimination'.
    Evans TE
    Hosp Pract; 1977 Dec; 12(12):13,16. PubMed ID: 924423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minority admissions: beyond Bakke.
    Relman AS
    N Engl J Med; 1977 Nov; 297(21):1175. PubMed ID: 917046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. After Bakke, what?
    Alexis CP
    JAMA; 1978 Sep; 240(9):831-2. PubMed ID: 671726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. After Bakke many questions are left unanswered.
    Graumann FW; Lippman ME
    Hospitals; 1978 Nov; 52(22):73-5. PubMed ID: 700653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The MCAT revisited.
    Powers RD
    N Engl J Med; 1984 Feb; 310(6):398-401. PubMed ID: 6690980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.