These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. [The contribution of the pendular rotation test in the diagnosis of the spinal form of multiple sclerosis (author's transl)]. Scarpalezos S; Tsakanikas C; Stamboulis E Rev Neurol (Paris); 1981; 137(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 7244494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Clinical usefulness of MRI in acute phase of spinal multiple sclerosis--influence of high-dose steroid therapy in acute phase]. Nomura M; Suzumura A; Anno H; Miyata E; Koga S; Yamamoto H Rinsho Shinkeigaku; 1995 Mar; 35(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 7614741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Comparative statistical study of the visual evoked potentials in subjects suspected of having multiple sclerosis with and without ophthalmic signs]. Le Gargasson JF; Rigaudière F; Grall Y; Keller J; Ingster-Moati I; Pizzato M Ophtalmologie; 1988; 2(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 3247155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Proceedings: Neurophysiological examinations in the differential diagnosis of cervical spinal processes. Malin JP; Stölzel R; v Hartrott HH Acta Neurochir (Wien); 1975; 31(3-4):295. PubMed ID: 1181882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials in the diagnosis of focal lesions of the spinal cord]. Prieto J; Esteban A Neurologia; 1995 Nov; 10(9):355-61. PubMed ID: 8554790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Intrinsic spinal cord lesions in 2 patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Dolan AL; Gibson T J Rheumatol; 1994 Jun; 21(6):1160-1. PubMed ID: 7932436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Non-invasive central nervous system disease associated with lymphoid tumors. Richter RB; Moore RY Johns Hopkins Med J; 1968 May; 122(5):271-83. PubMed ID: 5655170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Visual evoked potentials with special reference to sex difference in normal subjects and abnormality in multiple sclerosis patients. Nystad R J Oslo City Hosp; 1984; 34(3-4):29-34. PubMed ID: 6707784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Pattern evoked potential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a comparison of various contrast stimuli. Riemslag FC; Spekreijse H; van Walbeek H Adv Neurol; 1982; 32():417-26. PubMed ID: 7054965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The value of measuring saccadic eye movement in the investigation of non-compressive myelopathy. Pitt MC; Rawles JM J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1989 Oct; 52(10):1157-61. PubMed ID: 2795041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The significance of visual evoked cortical potentials for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis]. Stadler G; Straub W Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1982; 79(4):358-60. PubMed ID: 7185713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]