151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7058214)
1. Failure to obtain functional equivalence between dopamine receptor blockade and extinction: evidence supporting a sensory-motor conditioning hypothesis.
Tombaugh TN; Szostak C; Voorneveld P; Tombaugh JW
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Jan; 16(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 7058214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extinction and dopamine receptor blockade after intermittent reinforcement training: failure to observe functional equivalence.
Tombaugh TN; Anisman H; Tombaugh J
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 70(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 6775330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on alimentary behaviors: home cage food consumption, magazine training, operant acquisition, and performance.
Tombaugh TN; Tombaugh J; Anisman H
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1979; 66(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 119268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance effects with repeated-response measures during pimozide-produced dopamine receptor blockade.
Ettenberg A; Cinsavich SA; White N
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Nov; 11(5):557-61. PubMed ID: 531078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of extinction, pimozide, SCH 23390, and metoclopramide on food-rewarded operant responding of rats.
Beninger RJ; Cheng M; Hahn BL; Hoffman DC; Mazurski EJ; Morency MA; Ramm P; Stewart RJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1987; 92(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 2957718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of pimozide on appetitive behavior and locomotor activity: dissimilarity of effects when compared to extinction.
Spivak KJ; Amit Z
Physiol Behav; 1986; 36(3):457-63. PubMed ID: 3703975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pimozide prevents the response-reinstating effects of water reinforcement in rats.
Ettenberg A; Horvitz JC
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1990 Nov; 37(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 2087488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the effects of pimozide and nonreinforcement on discriminated operant responding in rats.
Beninger RJ
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Apr; 16(4):667-9. PubMed ID: 7071097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Establishment of secondary reinforcement in sign tracking and place preference tests following pimozide treatment.
Tombaugh TN; Grandmaison LJ; Zito KA
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Oct; 17(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 7178180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does pimozide block the reinforcing effect of brain stimulation?
Gallistel CR; Boytim M; Gomita Y; Klebanoff L
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Oct; 17(4):769-81. PubMed ID: 7178186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of amphetamine-produced environment-specific conditioning.
Beninger RJ; Hahn BL
Science; 1983 Jun; 220(4603):1304-6. PubMed ID: 6857251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dissociation of the attentional and motivational effects of pimozide on the threshold for rewarding brain stimulation.
Bird M; Kornetsky C
Neuropsychopharmacology; 1990 Feb; 3(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 2137697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement as a function of the amount of conditioning.
Hoffman DC; Beninger RJ
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1985; 87(4):454-60. PubMed ID: 3001808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pimozide attenuates lever pressing for water reinforcement in rats.
Gerber GJ; Sing J; Wise RA
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1981 Feb; 14(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 7208559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Some effects of pimozide on nondeprived rats' lever pressing maintained by a sucrose reward in an anhedonia paradigm.
Gramling SE; Fowler SC; Tizzano JP
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1987 May; 27(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 3615548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pimozide blocks reinforcement but not priming from MFB stimulation in the rat.
Wasserman EM; Gomita Y; Gallistel CR
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Oct; 17(4):783-7. PubMed ID: 7178187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pimozide, like extinction, devalues stimuli associated with sucrose taking.
Johnston LD; Beninger RJ; Olmstead MC
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2001 Mar; 68(3):583-90. PubMed ID: 11325415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Force-proportional reinforcement: pimozide does not reduce rats' emission of higher forces for sweeter rewards.
Kirkpatrick MA; Fowler SC
Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1989 Feb; 32(2):499-504. PubMed ID: 2727011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of pimozide on the establishment of conditioned reinforcement.
Beninger RJ; Phillips AG
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 68(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 6776557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of cocaine-produced environment-specific conditioning.
Beninger RJ; Herz RS
Life Sci; 1986 Apr; 38(15):1425-31. PubMed ID: 3959762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
