These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7058860)

  • 21. Maximum surgical blood ordering schedule in a district general hospital saves money and resources.
    Richardson NG; Bradley WN; Donaldson DR; O'Shaughnessy DF
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1998 Jul; 80(4):262-5. PubMed ID: 9771226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Revisiting of preoperative blood ordering policy--a single institute's experience in Taiwan.
    Lin JS; Chen YJ; Tzeng CH; Lyou JY; Lee CH
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2006 Nov; 69(11):507-11. PubMed ID: 17116611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [More effective blood transfusion policies in elective surgery by objective transfusion guidelines].
    Storm H; Morshuis WJ; Kluft O; Posma FD
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1989 Jun; 133(23):1170-4. PubMed ID: 2747810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preoperative blood ordering.
    Stehling LC
    Int Anesthesiol Clin; 1982; 20(4):45-57. PubMed ID: 7174125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rationalising cross-match requests in vascular surgery is safe and cost effective.
    Bamford RF; Hall A; Loftus IM; Thompson MM; Black SA
    J Perioper Pract; 2014 Sep; 24(9):206-9. PubMed ID: 25326941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are Preoperative Serologic Type and Screen Tests Necessary for Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients in Specialty Surgical Hospitals?
    Tischler EH; Chen AF; Matthews CN; Arnold WV; Smith EB
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2442-2446. PubMed ID: 27237967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experience with a cost-effective crossmatch protocol.
    Shulman IA; Nelson JM; Kent DR; Jacobs VL; Nakayama RK; Malone SA
    JAMA; 1985 Jul; 254(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 3999355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing blood utilization by implementation of a type-and-screen transfusion policy a single-institution experience.
    Alghamdi S; Gonzalez B; Howard L; Zeichner S; LaPietra A; Rosen G; Garcia G; Lamelas J; Goldszer R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 141(6):892-5. PubMed ID: 24838335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How appropriately is blood ordered in a rural hospital?
    Cheng DR; Bajraszewski C; Verma KP; Wolff AM
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2013 Feb; 48(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 22840204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prevalence of clinically significant antibodies in patients undergoing elective surgery in a Nigerian teaching hospital: A case for the type and screen method.
    Obi EI; Pughikumo OC; Korubo KI; Ejele AO
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Feb; 23(2):138-146. PubMed ID: 32031086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Blood Requisition and Utilization Practice in Surgical Patients in a Teaching Hospital, Western Nepal.
    Karki OB
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2016; 14(53):27-30. PubMed ID: 27892437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of two platelet transfusion strategies to minimize ABO-nonidentical transfusion, outdating, and shortages using a computer-simulated "virtual blood bank".
    Jackups R; Kymes S
    Transfusion; 2015 Feb; 55(2):348-56. PubMed ID: 25178153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The evolution of perioperative transfusion testing and blood ordering.
    White MJ; Hazard SW; Frank SM; Boyd JS; Wick EC; Ness PM; Tobian AA
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Jun; 120(6):1196-203. PubMed ID: 25988630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An analysis of blood usage in elective surgery.
    Ong YW; Vathsala A; Ng HW
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1984 Jul; 13(3):531-7. PubMed ID: 6517521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reducing unnecessary preoperative blood orders and costs by implementing an updated institution-specific maximum surgical blood order schedule and a remote electronic blood release system.
    Frank SM; Oleyar MJ; Ness PM; Tobian AA
    Anesthesiology; 2014 Sep; 121(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 24932853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The efficacy of type and screen to reduce unnecessary cross matches for obstetric patients.
    Ness PM; Rosche ME; Barrasso C; Luff RD; Johnson JW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jul; 140(6):661-4. PubMed ID: 7258239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pediatric preoperative blood ordering: when is a type and screen or crossmatch really needed?
    Fernández AM; Cronin J; Greenberg RS; Heitmiller ES
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Feb; 24(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 23957750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. From maximum surgical blood ordering schedule to unlimited computer crossmatching: evolution of blood transfusion for surgical patients at a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong.
    Chan AH; Chan JC; Wong LY; Cheng G
    Transfus Med; 1996 Jun; 6(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 8809959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimal hemotherapy in elective surgery.
    Michiels JJ; Bruining HA; Kothe FC
    Neth J Surg; 1985 Apr; 37(2):35-7. PubMed ID: 4000516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of preoperative laboratory investigation and blood cross-match on clinical management of pediatric neurosurgical patients.
    Yang MM; Singhal A; Au N; Hengel AR
    Childs Nerv Syst; 2015 Apr; 31(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 25694024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.