These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7059419)

  • 1. Comparison of two recently published algorithms for assessing the probability of adverse drug reactions.
    Busto U; Naranjo CA; Sellers EM
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1982 Feb; 13(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 7059419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the reproducibility of the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale score in published case reports.
    Liang R; Borgundvaag B; McIntyre M; Thwaites C; Ragan K; Wyllie A
    Pharmacotherapy; 2014 Nov; 34(11):1159-66. PubMed ID: 25266970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Bayesian approach and a simple algorithm for assessment of adverse drug events.
    Lanctôt KL; Naranjo CA
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1995 Dec; 58(6):692-8. PubMed ID: 8529335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three algorithms used to evaluate adverse drug reactions.
    Michel DJ; Knodel LC
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Jul; 43(7):1709-14. PubMed ID: 3752106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A quantitative approach of using genetic algorithm in designing a probability scoring system of an adverse drug reaction assessment system.
    Koh Y; Yap CW; Li SC
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jun; 77(6):421-30. PubMed ID: 17921048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consistency of assessment of adverse drug reactions in psychiatric hospitals: a comparison of an algorithmic and an empirical approach.
    Schmidt LG; Dirschedl P; Grohmann R; Scherer J; Wunderlich O; Müller-Oerlinghausen B
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1986; 30(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 3709646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An algorithm to detect adverse drug reactions in the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Du W; Lehr VT; Lieh-Lai M; Koo W; Ward RM; Rieder MJ; Van Den Anker JN; Reeves JH; Mathew M; Lulic-Botica M; Aranda JV
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Jan; 53(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 23400748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misuse of the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale in toxicology.
    Seger D; Barker K; McNaughton C
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2013 Jul; 51(6):461-6. PubMed ID: 23777343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of naranjo adverse drug reactions probability scale in causality assessment of drug-induced liver injury.
    García-Cortés M; Lucena MI; Pachkoria K; Borraz Y; Hidalgo R; Andrade RJ;
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 May; 27(9):780-9. PubMed ID: 18284654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An intensive drug monitoring study suggesting possible clinical irrelevance of impaired drug disposition in liver disease.
    Naranjo CA; Busto U; Janecek E; Ruiz I; Roach CA; Kaplan K
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1983 Apr; 15(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 6849781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring drug safety in Astrakhan, Russia.
    Kirilochev OO; Dorfman IP; Umerova AR
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S33-4. PubMed ID: 26639700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adverse drug reaction monitoring in a secondary care hospital in South India.
    Arulmani R; Rajendran SD; Suresh B
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 17662089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Development and Validation of Estimate Equations for Adverse Drug Reactions Using Risk Factors and Subjective Symptoms].
    Suzuki R; Ohtsu F; Goto N
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2015; 135(7):895-916. PubMed ID: 26135088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An algorithm for the operational assessment of adverse drug reactions. II. Demonstration of reproducibility and validity.
    Hutchinson TA; Leventhal JM; Kramer MS; Karch FE; Lipman AG; Feinstein AR
    JAMA; 1979 Aug; 242(7):633-8. PubMed ID: 449003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An approach to the evaluation and documentation of adverse drug reaction.
    Goh CL
    Singapore Med J; 1989 Jun; 30(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 2531469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adverse drug reactions in neonates: a prospective study.
    Belén Rivas A; Arruza L; Pacheco E; Portoles A; Diz J; Vargas E
    Arch Dis Child; 2016 Apr; 101(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 26819267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast Screening Technology for Drug Emergency Management: Predicting Suspicious SNPs for ADR with Information Theory-based Models.
    Liang Z; Liu J; Huang JX; Zeng X
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2018; 21(2):93-99. PubMed ID: 29336255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis-based and external cause-based criteria to identify adverse drug reactions in hospital ICD-coded data: application to an Australia population-based study.
    Du W; Pearson SA; Buckley NA; Day C; Banks E
    Public Health Res Pract; 2017 Apr; 27(2):. PubMed ID: 28474053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Algorithms used in adverse drug event reports: a comparative study.
    Frick PA; Cohen LG; Rovers JP
    Ann Pharmacother; 1997 Feb; 31(2):164-7. PubMed ID: 9034415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adverse Drug Reactions Related to Drug Administration in Hospitalized Patients.
    Gallelli L; Siniscalchi A; Palleria C; Mumoli L; Staltari O; Squillace A; Maida F; Russo E; Gratteri S; De Sarro G;
    Curr Drug Saf; 2017; 12(3):171-177. PubMed ID: 28625147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.