These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7060764)
41. [Transposition of the fallopian tube as a therapeutic possibility in special cases of tubal sterility]. Volk M; Obermaier W; Tabatabai K; Ernert E; Berndt D Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1994 Sep; 54(9):515-8. PubMed ID: 7988855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [The current status of microsurgical sterility operations in the treatment of tubal sterility]. Freude G; Leodolter S Gynakol Rundsch; 1989; 29 Suppl 2():300-3. PubMed ID: 2613033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Microsurgical fallopian tube transposition with subsequent term pregnancy. Goldberg JM; Friedman CI Fertil Steril; 1988 Oct; 50(4):660-1. PubMed ID: 3169288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Repeat tuboplasty compared with primary microsurgery for postinflammatory tubal disease. Thie JL; Williams TJ; Coulam CB Fertil Steril; 1986 Jun; 45(6):784-7. PubMed ID: 3709827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A comparison of gross and microsurgical techniques for repair of cornual occlusion in infertility: a retrospective study, 1968-1978. Diamond E Fertil Steril; 1979 Oct; 32(4):370-6. PubMed ID: 488421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic fimbrioplasty in nonocclusive distal tubal disease. Saleh WA; Dlugi AM Fertil Steril; 1997 Mar; 67(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 9091333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Previous ectopic pregnancy should be considered a contraindication for microsurgery. Strandell A; Thorburn J Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Apr; 75(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 8638463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Conservative surgical management of isthmic ectopic pregnancies. Smith HO; Toledo AA; Thompson JD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 157(3):604-10. PubMed ID: 3631162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Microsurgery of the fallopian tube. Levinson CJ; Simon T Compr Ther; 1979 Sep; 5(9):61-8. PubMed ID: 158481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Microsurgery of distal tubal lesions. Analysis of 270 operated cases]. Donnez J; Casanas-Roux F J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 3734348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Tubal microsurgery. The opinions of the experts [proceedings]. Soihet S Int J Fertil; 1978; 23(4):251. PubMed ID: 33912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Reconstructive, organ-preserving microsurgery in tubal infertility: still an alternative to in vitro fertilization. Schippert C; Bassler C; Soergel P; Hille U; Hollwitz B; Garcia-Rocha GJ Fertil Steril; 2010 Mar; 93(4):1359-61. PubMed ID: 19782355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Use of microsurgical technics in the treatment of tubal infertility of tuberculous etiology]. Tumanov IP; Kochorova MN Probl Tuberk; 1990; (2):6-8. PubMed ID: 2345746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Factors influencing the outcome of microsurgical tubal ligation reversals. Seiler JC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jun; 146(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 6859139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]