These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7060839)

  • 1. Combined effects of earmold vents and suboscillatory feedback on hearing aid frequency response.
    Cox RM
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 7060839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of vent effects between a solid earmold and a hollow earmold.
    Kuk F; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Sep; 20(8):480-91. PubMed ID: 19764168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Side branch and parallel vent effects in real ears and in acoustical and electrical models.
    Studebaker GA; Cox RM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 914672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of venting on wind noise levels measured at the eardrum.
    Chung K
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 23403807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulating the open-loop transfer function as a means for understanding acoustic feedback in hearing aids.
    Egolf DP; Haley BT; Howell HC; Legowski S; Larson VD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):454-67. PubMed ID: 2921422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occlusion and coupling effects with different earmold designs - all a matter of opening the ear canal?
    Denk F; Hieke T; Roberz M; Husstedt H
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 62(3):227-237. PubMed ID: 35254186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The hearing aid feedback path: mathematical simulations and experimental verification.
    Egolf DP; Howell HC; Weaver KA; Barker DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Nov; 78(5):1578-87. PubMed ID: 4067073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An objective procedure for evaluation of adaptive antifeedback algorithms in hearing aids.
    Freed DJ; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):382-98. PubMed ID: 16825888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open Versus Closed Hearing-Aid Fittings: A Literature Review of Both Fitting Approaches.
    Winkler A; Latzel M; Holube I
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26879562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing aid microphone location effects on speech discrimination in noise.
    Franks JR; Feth LL; Daniloff RG
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):241-50. PubMed ID: 7308598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limitations on insertion gains with vented earmoulds imposed by oscillatory feedback.
    Gatehouse S
    Br J Audiol; 1989 May; 23(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 2752217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic effects in in-the-ear hearing aid response: results from a computer simulation.
    Kates JM
    Ear Hear; 1988 Jun; 9(3):119-32. PubMed ID: 3410175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. System identification of feedback in hearing aids.
    Hellgren J; Lunner T; Arlinger S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3481-96. PubMed ID: 10380671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variations in the feedback of hearing aids.
    Hellgren J; Lunner T; Arlinger S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2821-33. PubMed ID: 10573898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximum usable real-ear insertion gain with ten earmold designs.
    Kuk FK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1994 Jan; 5(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 8155894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individualized correction factors in the preselection of hearing aids.
    Fikret-Pasa S; Revit LJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Apr; 35(2):384-400. PubMed ID: 1573878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of recent hearing aid improvements on management of the hearing impaired.
    Cashman M; Corbin H; Riko K; Rossman R
    J Otolaryngol; 1984 Aug; 13(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 6471158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of functional gain and 2 cm3 coupler gain.
    Hawkins DB; Haskell GB
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 Feb; 47(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7176579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of venting the ear mold on speech discrimination in masking noise].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Fastl H
    HNO; 1991 Sep; 39(9):356-61. PubMed ID: 1748579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gain and feedback problems when fitting behind-the-ear hearing aids to profoundly hearing-impaired children.
    Dyrlund O; Lundh P
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 2371540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.