These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7060841)

  • 1. Usage of CROS and IROS hearing aids by patients with bilateral high-frequency hearing loss.
    Gelfand SA; Silman S
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 7060841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefit of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral cochlear implant users.
    Weder S; Kompis M; Caversaccio M; Stieger C
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 25501444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effectiveness in Rehabilitation of Current Wireless CROS Technology in Experienced Bone-Anchored Implant Users.
    Snapp HA; Hoffer ME; Liu X; Rajguru SM
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 29135863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Speech-in-Noise and Localization Benefits in Unilateral Hearing Loss Subjects Using Contralateral Routing of Signal Hearing Aids or Bone-Anchored Implants.
    Snapp HA; Holt FD; Liu X; Rajguru SM
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 27846038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical effectiveness of wireless CROS (contralateral routing of offside signals) hearing aids.
    Ryu NG; Moon IJ; Byun H; Jin SH; Park H; Jang KS; Cho YS
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 272(9):2213-9. PubMed ID: 24952106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral inner ear deafness: a study of 20 patients.
    Hol MK; Bosman AJ; Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(5):274-81. PubMed ID: 15316200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contralateral routing of signals in unilateral hearing impairment. A better method of fitting.
    Ericson H; Svärd I; Högset O; Devert G; Ekström L
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 3187373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane.
    Pedley AJ; Kitterick PT
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():104-111. PubMed ID: 28666702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The current status of audiologic rehabilitation for profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Bishop CE; Eby TL
    Laryngoscope; 2010 Mar; 120(3):552-6. PubMed ID: 20014322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of patient satisfaction with various configurations of digital CROS and BiCROS hearing aids.
    Hill SL; Marcus A; Digges EN; Gillman N; Silverstein H
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2006 Jul; 85(7):427-30, 442. PubMed ID: 16909811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unilateral sensorineural hearing loss rehabilitation.
    Welling DB; Glasscock ME; Woods CI; Sheffey RC
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1991 Dec; 105(6):771-6. PubMed ID: 1787965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contralateral Routing of Signal Systems Can Improve Speech Recognition and Comprehension in Dynamic Classrooms.
    Picou EM; Davis H; Lewis D; Tharpe AM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 63(7):2468-2482. PubMed ID: 32574079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss. German version].
    Arndt S; Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Hassepass F; Beck R; Wesarg T
    HNO; 2017 Jul; 65(7):586-598. PubMed ID: 27995277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evidence base for the application of contralateral bone anchored hearing aids in acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss in adults.
    Baguley DM; Bird J; Humphriss RL; Prevost AT
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2006 Feb; 31(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 16441794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefit from, and acclimatization to, frequency compression hearing aids in experienced adult hearing-aid users.
    Ellis RJ; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 25470620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Usage of CROS hearing aids by unilaterally deaf patients.
    Gelfand SA
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1979 Jun; 105(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 454284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.