These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7061211)

  • 1. Interocular luminance differences and the binocular pattern-reversal visual-evoked response.
    Trick GL; Dawson WW; Compton JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1982 Mar; 22(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 7061211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pattern reversal VER as a tool for evaluating unbalanced visual inputs between the two eyes.
    Katsumi O; Hirose T; Tanino T; Uemura Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1988; 32(1):86-97. PubMed ID: 3411817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of the effect of temporal frequency on the dichoptic visual-evoked response.
    Trick GL; Compton JR
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Feb; 59(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 7065109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of stimulus contrast on binocular VER.
    Katsumi O; Oguchi Y; Kawara T; Peli E
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1984; 28(4):401-8. PubMed ID: 6530840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interocular differences in visual latency induced by reduced-aperture monovision.
    Plainis S; Petratou D; Giannakopoulou T; Radhakrishnan H; Pallikaris IG; Charman WN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 23278194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tonic interocular suppression, binocular summation, and the visual evoked potential.
    Eysteinsson T; Barris MC; Denny N; Frumkes TE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jul; 34(8):2443-8. PubMed ID: 8325752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ensemble cortical responses to rival visual stimuli: effect of monocular transient.
    Wen Y; Zhang Q
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2009 Feb; 380(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19167358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
    Lou L
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(14):1514-21. PubMed ID: 18511096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binocular summation in visually evoked responses and visual acuity.
    Heravian JS; Jenkins TC; Douthwaite WA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jul; 10(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 2216474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduced binocular beat visual evoked responses and stereoacuity in patients with Duane syndrome.
    Sloper JJ; Garnham C; Gous P; Dyason R; Plunkett D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Nov; 42(12):2826-30. PubMed ID: 11687524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binocular VEP summation in infants and adults with abnormal binocular histories.
    Shea SL; Aslin RN; McCulloch D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1987 Feb; 28(2):356-65. PubMed ID: 8591919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    James AC; Ruseckaite R; Maddess T
    Vis Neurosci; 2005; 22(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 15842740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local binocular fusion is involved in global binocular rivalry.
    Takase S; Yukumatsu S; Bingushi K
    Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1798-803. PubMed ID: 18585751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A VEP measure of the binocular fusion of horizontal and vertical disparities.
    Hale J; Harrad RA; McKee SP; Pettet MW; Norcia AM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 May; 46(5):1786-90. PubMed ID: 15851583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanism of binocular interaction in refraction errors: study using pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.
    di Summa A; Fusina S; Bertolasi L; Vicentini S; Perlini S; Bongiovanni LG; Polo A
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1999; 98(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 10947000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual evoked responses to pattern-reversal: the signal-to-noise ratio.
    Peregrin J; Valach M; Vít F; Kuba M
    Physiol Bohemoslov; 1984; 33(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 6484026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel way to make transient-VEPs a better predictor of human binocular integration.
    Lefebvre L; Théoret H; Saint-Amour D
    Neuroreport; 2010 Nov; 21(16):1023-8. PubMed ID: 20827225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monocular motion adaptation affects the perceived trajectory of stereomotion.
    Brooks KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Dec; 28(6):1470-82. PubMed ID: 12542138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Localization of monocular stimuli in different depth planes.
    Shimono K; Tam WJ; Asakura N; Ohmi M
    Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(20):2631-41. PubMed ID: 16005487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relation of monocular optokinetic nystagmus to peripheral binocular interactions.
    Mohn G; Sireteanu R; van Hof-van Duin J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1986 Apr; 27(4):565-73. PubMed ID: 3957576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.