BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7061731)

  • 1. Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Healey EC
    J Commun Disord; 1982 Jan; 15(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 7061731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of stutterers' voice onset times and fundamental frequency contours during fluency.
    Healey EC; Gutkin B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Jun; 27(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 6738033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of stutterers' and nonstutterers' affective, cognitive, and behavioral self-reports.
    Watson JB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):377-85. PubMed ID: 3172754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Formant frequencies of stuttered and fluent vowels.
    Prosek RA; Montgomery AA; Walden BE; Hawkins DB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 3669636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of period-by-period fundamental frequency of stutterers and nonstutterers over repeated utterances.
    Sacco PR; Metz DE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 2739393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spontaneous imitation of fundamental frequency and speech rate by nonstutterers and stutterers.
    Bosshardt HG; Sappok C; Knipschild M; Hölscher C
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1997 Jul; 26(4):425-48. PubMed ID: 9232010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preparation time and response complexity effects on stutterers' and nonstutterers' acoustic LRT.
    Dembowski J; Watson BC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 34(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 2008080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic measures of stutterers' and nonstutterers' fluency in two speech contexts.
    Healey EC; Ramig PR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Sep; 29(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 3762096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constancy of relative timing for stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Prosek RA; Montgomery AA; Walden BE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):654-8. PubMed ID: 3230895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spectrographic study of vowels in stutterers' fluent speech.
    Klich RJ; May GM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 7176608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic evidence of aberrant velocities in stutterers' fluent speech.
    Pindzola RH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Apr; 62(2):399-405. PubMed ID: 3503243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stutterers' and nonstutterers' voice fundamental frequency changes in response to auditory stimuli.
    McLean-Muse A; Larson CR; Gregory HH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):549-55. PubMed ID: 3230885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subvocalization and reading rate differences between stuttering and nonstuttering children and adults.
    Bosshardt HG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):776-85. PubMed ID: 2273890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acknowledgment and severity of stuttering as factors influencing nonstutterers' perceptions of stutterers.
    Collins CR; Blood GW
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 Feb; 55(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 2299842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal characteristics related to the discrimination of stutterers' and nonstutterers' speech samples.
    Prosek RA; Runyan CM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Mar; 25(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 7087422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech shadowing characteristics of stutterers under diotic and dichotic conditions.
    Healey EC; Howe SW
    J Commun Disord; 1987 Dec; 20(6):493-506. PubMed ID: 3693593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-efficacy scaling by adult stutterers.
    Ornstein AF; Manning WH
    J Commun Disord; 1985 Aug; 18(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 4019820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shadowed and simple reaction times in stutterers and nonstutterers.
    Harbison DC; Porter RJ; Tobey EA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1277-84. PubMed ID: 2808903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of speech envelopes of stutters and nonstutterers.
    Kuniszyk-Jóźkowiak W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1105-10. PubMed ID: 8759963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vocal and finger reaction times in stutterers and nonstutterers: differences and correlations.
    Starkweather CW; Franklin S; Smigo TM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Jun; 27(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 6738029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.