These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7061957)
41. [Importance of abnormal fetal presentation of twins during labor and delivery]. Jakobovits A Orv Hetil; 1993 Dec; 134(52):2869-71. PubMed ID: 8272353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The magnetic resonance imaging-based fetal-pelvic index: a pilot study in the community hospital. Fox LK; Huerta-Enochian GS; Hamlin JA; Katz VL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1679-85; discussion 1685-8. PubMed ID: 15284768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. X-ray pelvimetry and trial of labor after previous cesarean section. A prospective study. Nielsen TF; Hökegård KH; Moldin PG Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1985; 64(6):485-90. PubMed ID: 4061065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An appraisal of computed tomography pelvimetry in patients with previous caesarean section. Abu-Ghazzeh YM; Barqawi R East Mediterr Health J; 2000; 6(2-3):260-4. PubMed ID: 11556010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. X-ray pelvimetry and labour outcome in term pregnancy in a rural Nigerian population. Irurhe NK; Duru FI; Ibeabuchi NM; Adewunmi MA; Okanlawon OA; Adekola OO Nig Q J Hosp Med; 2012; 22(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 23175909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Dillema about the method of delivery for the fetus in breech presentation]. Vasilj O; Matijević R; Grgić O Acta Med Croatica; 2007 Apr; 61(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 17585474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Vaginal breech deliveries selected using computed tomographic pelvimetry may be associated with fewer adverse outcomes. Jeyabalan A; Larkin RW; Landers DV J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jun; 17(6):381-5. PubMed ID: 16009640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of pregnancy and delivery in low gynecologic age adolescents. Warman R; Col de Loza A; Giorgio E; Mendez Ribas JM Prog Clin Biol Res; 1982; 112 Pt B():239-48. PubMed ID: 7163315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Relevance of clinical pelvimetry to obstetric practice in developing countries. Adinma JI; Agbai AO; Anolue FC West Afr J Med; 1997; 16(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 9133823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise. Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. An evaluation of the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry: comparison of the Thoms and modified Ball methods with manual pelvimetry. Fine EA; Bracken M; Berkowitz RL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 137(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 7369283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Magnetic resonance-based serial pelvimetry: do maternal pelvic dimensions change during pregnancy? Huerta-Enochian GS; Katz VL; Fox LK; Hamlin JA; Kollath JP Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun; 194(6):1689-94; discussion 1694-5. PubMed ID: 16731086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Abdominal delivery of the second twin. Roopnarinesingh AJ J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 12521458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The value of X-ray pelvimetry in previous caesarean section pregnancies. Wright M S Afr Med J; 1985 Sep; 68(6):409-11. PubMed ID: 4035514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Childhood cancer after prenatal exposure to diagnostic X-ray examinations in Britain. Mole RH Br J Cancer; 1990 Jul; 62(1):152-68. PubMed ID: 2202420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Problems of the diagnosis of a narrow pelvis in women with a history of poliomyelitis, and the management of labor]. Utkin VM; Eniushin VD; Abramova VM; Semikina OM Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1985 Oct; (10):48-50. PubMed ID: 2935009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]