These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7061957)
61. Continuing use of x-ray pelvimetry for pregnant women. Gellhorn A; Levensohn A; Kaufman G; Iwan L N Y State J Med; 1987 Jul; 87(7):411-2. PubMed ID: 3476874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. The role of cephalopelvimetry in the diagnosis of disproportion in breech presentation. Perlmann T S Afr Med J; 1973 Jul; 47(29):1312-4. PubMed ID: 4720613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. [Sonographic diagnosis of channel pelvis]. Bartl W; Bernaschek G; Wolf G Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1984 Apr; 96(8):276-9. PubMed ID: 6741149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. [Vaginosonographic pelvimetry as a new method of the sonographic determination of internal pelvic measurements]. Deutinger J; Bernaschek G Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 Jun; 46(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 3527857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Medical diagnostic X-ray irradiation and risk of leukemia in urban adult population of Poland. I. Design of the study. Gajewski AK; Rozycki Z; Słowikowska GM; Krzyzanowski M; Majle T Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1988; 39(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 3238286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. [To which extent ar x-rays responsible for the development of malignant diseases in children? II. Ossification disorders of the hand bones in leukemic children]. Gefferth K Strahlentherapie; 1969 Apr; 137(4):442-50. PubMed ID: 4309768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. [The role of ultrasonic pelvimetry in obstetrics]. Szoke B; Kiss D Orv Hetil; 1977 May; 118(21):1233-4. PubMed ID: 865807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. [Stochastic risk estimation from medical x-ray diagnostic examinations. 2. Risk estimates of individuals from x-ray diagnosis (author's transl)]. Hashizume T; Maruyama T; Noda Y; Iwai K; Nishizawa K; Tateno Y Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Jan; 41(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 7232112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. [Risk of radiation injury to the fetus in abdominal or pelvic radiography in pregnancy]. MAGNUSSON W Nord Med; 1955 Jan; 53(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 14356421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. X-ray pelvimetry in breech presentation. Andaya MV; Fiesta M Philipp J Surg Surg Spec; 1966; 21(5):288-98. PubMed ID: 6013480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Prenatal x-ray exposure and childhood neoplasms. Stewart A Br J Radiol; 1972 Oct; 45(538):794. PubMed ID: 5078958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Radiation hazards to the human fetus in present-day society. Should a pregnant women be subjected to a diagnostic x-ray procedure? Schwarz GS Bull N Y Acad Med; 1968 Apr; 44(4):388-99. PubMed ID: 5241249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. [On the indication for radiographic measurement of the true conjugate diameter in breech preetation]. Gödel E Zentralbl Gynakol; 1967 Mar; 89(10):343-8. PubMed ID: 5585513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Prenatal X-ray exposure and childhood cancer in twins. N Engl J Med; 1985 Jun; 312(24):1574-5. PubMed ID: 4000191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. THE CONDUCT AND MANAGEMENT OF FACE PRESENTATIONS. GOLD S J Int Coll Surg; 1965 Mar; 43():253-8. PubMed ID: 14261309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Efficacy of the fetal-pelvic index in patients requiring labor induction. Morgan MA; Thurnau GR Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Sep; 159(3):621-5. PubMed ID: 3048100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Should we abandon X-ray pelvimetry? Hogston P Br J Clin Pract; 1989 Feb; 43(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 2679839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]