BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7063139)

  • 21. A comparison of compound action potential and cochlear microphonic two-tone suppression in the guinea pig.
    Remond MC; Harrison RV; Legouix JP
    Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 8(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 7142036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Estimating peripheral gain and compression using fixed-duration masking curves.
    Yasin I; Drga V; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4145-55. PubMed ID: 23742366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Growth of suppression in the cochlear potentials.
    Cheatham MA
    Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):291-4. PubMed ID: 2995299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cochlear efferent neurones and protection against acoustic trauma: protection of outer hair cell receptor current and interanimal variability.
    Patuzzi RB; Thompson ML
    Hear Res; 1991 Jul; 54(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 1917716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Frequency dependence of cochlear microphonic augmentation produced by olivo-cochlear bundle stimulation.
    Kittrell BJ; Dalland JI
    Laryngoscope; 1969 Feb; 79(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 5765246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of chronic cochlear de-efferentation on auditory-nerve response.
    Liberman MC
    Hear Res; 1990 Nov; 49(1-3):209-23. PubMed ID: 1705540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Offset AP masker tuning curve and the FFT of the stimulus.
    Henry KR; Lewis ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1354-62. PubMed ID: 3198871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Behavioral auditory function after transection of crossed olivo-cochlear bundle in the cat. IV. Study on pure-tone frequency discrimination.
    Igarashi M; Cranford JL; Nakai Y; Alford BR
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1979; 87(1-2):79-83. PubMed ID: 760381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Masked cochlear whole-nerve response intensity functions altered by electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle.
    Dolan DF; Nuttall AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1081-6. PubMed ID: 3356813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Latency and amplitude tuning curves of the N1 and N2 components of the cochlear nerve compound action potential.
    Henry KR; Sweet RJ; Price JM
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):122-34. PubMed ID: 2383212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Frequency selectivity of single cochlear-nerve fibers based on the temporal response pattern to two-tone signals.
    Greenberg S; Geisler CD; Deng L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1010-9. PubMed ID: 3700856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A computer model of medial efferent suppression in the mammalian auditory system.
    Ferry RT; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3519-26. PubMed ID: 18247760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efferent-induced change in human cochlear compression and its influence on masking of tones.
    Bhagat SP; Carter PH
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Nov; 485(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 20813158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does electrical stimulation of the crossed olivo-cochlear bundle produce movement of the organ of Corti?
    Patuzzi R; Rajan R
    Hear Res; 1990 Apr; 45(1-2):15-32. PubMed ID: 2345114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stimulation of efferents alters the cochlear microphonic and the sound-induced resistance changes measured in scale media of the guinea pig.
    Mountain DC; Geisler CD; Hubbard AE
    Hear Res; 1980 Oct; 3(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 7440426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of efferent neural activity on cochlear mechanics.
    Guinan JJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1986; 25():53-62. PubMed ID: 3472321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cochlear synaptogenesis after sectioning the efferent bundle.
    Pujol R; Carlier E
    Brain Res; 1982 Jan; 255(1):151-4. PubMed ID: 7055717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lateral suppression and inhibition in the cochlear nucleus of the cat.
    Rhode WS; Greenberg S
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 Feb; 71(2):493-514. PubMed ID: 8176421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The frequency selectivity of the normal and pathological human cochlea.
    Harrison RV; Aran JM; Negrevergne M
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 7271565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Long-term effects of sectioning the olivocochlear bundle in neonatal cats.
    Walsh EJ; McGee J; McFadden SL; Liberman MC
    J Neurosci; 1998 May; 18(10):3859-69. PubMed ID: 9570815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.