These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7063698)

  • 1. X-ray linear attenuation coefficients in the mammographic range for ultrasonic breast phantom materials.
    Burke TM; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA
    Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):755-7. PubMed ID: 7063698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Composition of mammographic phantom materials.
    Geise RA; Palchevsky A
    Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 8596830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. X-ray properties of an anthropomorphic breast phantom for MRI and x-ray imaging.
    Freed M; Badal A; Jennings RJ; de las Heras H; Myers KJ; Badano A
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 56(12):3513-33. PubMed ID: 21606556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mass attenuation coefficients of natural Rhizophora spp. wood for X-rays in the 15.77-25.27 keV range.
    Shakhreet BZ; Bauk S; Tajuddin AA; Shukri A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jul; 135(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 19482883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. X-ray characterization of breast phantom materials.
    Byng JW; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 May; 43(5):1367-77. PubMed ID: 9623665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An elastically compressible phantom material with mechanical and x-ray attenuation properties equivalent to breast tissue.
    Price BD; Gibson AP; Tan LT; Royle GJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1177-88. PubMed ID: 20107248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study of mammographic exposure and detail visibility using three systems: Xerox 125, Min-R, and Xonics XERG.
    Stanton L; Villafana T; Day JL; Lightfoot DA; Stanton RE
    Radiology; 1979 Aug; 132(2):455-62. PubMed ID: 461808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Production design and evaluation of a novel breast phantom with various breast glandular fractions.
    Fujisaki T; Kimura M; Saitoh H; Abe S; Hiraoka T
    Radiat Med; 2006 Dec; 24(10):647-52. PubMed ID: 17186318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography of a phantom and breast tissue with synchrotron radiation and a linear-array silicon detector.
    Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Dalla Palma L; Di Michiel M; Longo R; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Tromba G; Vacchi A
    Radiology; 1998 Sep; 208(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 9722850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.
    Boone JM
    Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10540637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.
    Gingold EL; Wu X; Barnes GT
    Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 7753987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.
    Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Palma LD; Michiel MD; Fabrizioli M; Longo R; Menk RH; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Ratti M; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F
    Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 10751500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polyvinyl chloride plastisol breast phantoms for ultrasound imaging.
    de Carvalho IM; De Matheo LL; Costa Júnior JF; Borba Cde M; von Krüger MA; Infantosi AF; Pereira WC
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Aug; 70():98-106. PubMed ID: 27153374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.
    Zankl M; Fill U; Hoeschen C; Panzer W; Regulla D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):410-4. PubMed ID: 15933148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
    Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
    Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of mammographic x-ray spectra.
    Fewell TR; Shuping RE
    Radiology; 1978 Jul; 128(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 663212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental validation of a radiographic simulation code using breast phantom for X-ray imaging.
    Bliznakova K; Speller R; Horrocks J; Liaparinos P; Kolitsi Z; Pallikarakis N
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Feb; 40(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 20056197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An anthropomorphic ultrasound breast phantom containing intermediate-sized scatterers.
    Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Frank GR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1982; 8(4):381-92. PubMed ID: 7112724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microscopic mechanism of attenuation of compressional ultrasonic waves in tissue-mimicking phantom materials.
    Wu EX; Goodsitt MM; Madsen EL
    Ultrason Imaging; 1992 Apr; 14(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 1604754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.