BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7063700)

  • 21. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Experimental and clinical studies on utility of advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary mass lesions].
    Itouji E; Kono M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1252-62. PubMed ID: 7610028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A detector for scanned projection radiography.
    Sones RA; Lauro KL; Cattell CL
    Radiology; 1990 May; 175(2):553-9. PubMed ID: 2326481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Experiences with a new film-screen system in pediatric thoracic radiography].
    Leenen A; Brandt GA; Riebel T; Marciniak H
    Rofo; 1996 Oct; 165(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 8963046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of resolution and sensitometric characteristics of an asymmetric screen-film imaging system.
    Gray JE; Stears JG; Swensen SJ; Bunch PC
    Radiology; 1993 Aug; 188(2):537-9. PubMed ID: 8327711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Suitability and comparison of compensating filters for thoracic diagnosis].
    Oestmann JW; Hendrickx P; Rieder P; Geerlings H
    Rofo; 1986 Apr; 144(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 3008250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Area beam equalization: optimization and performance of an automated prototype system for chest radiography.
    Xu T; Shikhaliev PM; Berenji GR; Tehranzadeh J; Saremi F; Molloi S
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Apr; 11(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 15109010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Small object contrast in AMBER and conventional chest radiography.
    Chotas HG; Van Metter RL; Johnson GA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1991 Sep; 180(3):853-9. PubMed ID: 1871306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The value of the InSight HC asymmetric film-screen system in thoracic diagnosis].
    Häussler MD; Lenzen H; Reckels C; Peters PE
    Rofo; 1994 Mar; 160(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 8136481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Photographic unsharp masking in chest radiography.
    Sorenson JA; Niklason LT; Nelson JA
    Invest Radiol; 1981; 16(4):281-8. PubMed ID: 7275540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Can digital luminescent radiography substitute for conventional x-ray technics in chest radiography?].
    Neufang KF; Krug B; Lorenz R; Steinbrich W
    Rofo; 1990 May; 152(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 2160680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Computed equalization radiography: preliminary clinical evaluation.
    Goodman LR; Wilson CR; Kim CS
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 8421742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Anatomically shaped, unsharp, lead-containing acrylic glass filter for optimization of thoracic roentgenography].
    Tuengerthal S; Ackermann L; Müller A
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Apr; 38(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 4001777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technical advances in chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Vyborny C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1049-59. PubMed ID: 7976874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Bedside thoracic radiography: a comparison between 3 different types of grid].
    Ciccotosto C; Storto ML; Guidotti A; Ferrante R; Bonomo L
    Radiol Med; 1994; 87(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 8128015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
    Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiation dose reduction for chest CT with non-linear adaptive filters.
    Singh S; Digumarthy SR; Back A; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Mar; 54(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 23185071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.