These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Digital radiography using luminescence phosphors. Meduri A; Campioni P; Macis G; Tartaglione T Rays; 1992; 17(3):433-48. PubMed ID: 1480787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics. Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Modification of the quality of the roentgen image by screen and film--experimental studies]. Maurer HJ; Goos F Rontgenblatter; 1985 Feb; 38(2):54-7. PubMed ID: 3983537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Use of a measuring device for determining the characteristic parameters of roentgen intensifying screens]. Mischke W; Tautz M; Brandt GA Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1982; 23(5):689-98. PubMed ID: 7178478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Control of cassettes for general roentgenography]. Novikov VIa; Chikirdin EG; Belikov VK Med Tekh; 1983; (2):45-6. PubMed ID: 6855512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analog image and digital image. Campioni P; Meduri A; Tartaglione T; Mazzone MA Rays; 1992; 17(3):416-32. PubMed ID: 1480786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique]. Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Current control of image quality in a radiology laboratory]. Wójtowicz J Pol Przegl Radiol; 1983; 47(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 6377274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Reduction of patient dose with maximum assurance of image quality]. Kuhn H Rontgenblatter; 1985 Jul; 38(7):224-30. PubMed ID: 4035266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of cassettes for uniformity and reliability of the enhancement factor]. Mechtel M Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):398-9. PubMed ID: 8580143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose. Seibert JA Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Experiences with using digital systems in radiology]. Busch HP Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Nov; 6(6):353-4. PubMed ID: 9081412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Considerations for selecting a digital radiography system. Morin RL; Seibert JA J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Mar; 2(3):287-90. PubMed ID: 17411815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [What effect do intensifying screens and general lack of resolution have on tomography?]. Meiler J Rontgenblatter; 1973 Jan; 26(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 4791869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems. Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]