These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7064678)

  • 1. The influence of femoral stem thickness and implantation technique on the strength of the bone cement bond.
    Savino AW; Andersson GB; Andriacchi TP; Hampton S; Galante JO
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1982 Feb; 53(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 7064678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prothesis cement envelope in femoral component total hips.
    Savino AW; Andersson GB; Andriacchi TP; Galante JO
    Surg Forum; 1978; 29():556-7. PubMed ID: 401259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
    Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pressurization and centralization enhance the quality and reproducibility of cement mantles.
    Noble PC; Collier MB; Maltry JA; Kamaric E; Tullos HS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):77-89. PubMed ID: 9917593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A plastic intermedullary plug for total hip arthroplasty.
    Mallory TH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1981; (155):37-40. PubMed ID: 7226628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty; should it be done?
    Li PL; Ingle PJ; Dowell JK
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 Sep; 78(5):809-11. PubMed ID: 8836076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The load carrying and fatigue properties of the stem-cement interface with smooth and porous coated femoral components.
    Manley MT; Stern LS; Gurtowski J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985; 19(5):563-75. PubMed ID: 4066729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
    Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis responsible to bone cement with customized prosthesis of proximal segmental femur].
    Liu Y; Tu CQ; Li XB; Duan H; Pei FX
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Mar; 38(2):324-7. PubMed ID: 17441361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A simple technique of removal of femoral cement plug in total hip prosthesis revision].
    Julliard R
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1996; 82(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 8761102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of implant orientation, canal fill, and implant fit on femoral strain patterns and implant stability during catastrophic testing of a canine cementless femoral prosthesis.
    Pernell RT; Milton JL; Gross RS; Montgomery RD; Wenzel JG; Savory CG; Aberman HM
    Vet Surg; 1995; 24(4):337-46. PubMed ID: 7571386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of femoral neck length, stem size, and body weight on strains in the proximal cement mantle.
    Harrington MA; O'Connor DO; Lozynsky AJ; Kovach I; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Apr; 84(4):573-9. PubMed ID: 11940617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fatigue fracture of a forged cobalt-chromium-molybdenum femoral component inserted with cement. A report of ten cases.
    Woolson ST; Milbauer JP; Bobyn JD; Yue S; Maloney WJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Dec; 79(12):1842-8. PubMed ID: 9409798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental study in femoral component total hip replacement: mechanical failures of cement-bone interface with comparison of prosthesis, cement thickness, orientation and plug insertion.
    Savino AW
    Proc Inst Med Chic; 1978; 32(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 662836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of dorsal flanges on fixation of a cemented total hip replacement femoral stem.
    Sangiorgio SN; Ebramzadeh E; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):813-20. PubMed ID: 15069149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical effects of stem cement interface characteristics in total hip replacement.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1996 Aug; (329):326-36. PubMed ID: 8769468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in-vitro investigation of the CPS-Plus femoral stem: influence of the proximal centraliser on cement pressurisation during stem insertion.
    Gozzard C; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW; Learmonth ID
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Apr; 74(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 12807321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.