These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7064678)

  • 21. Development of a computer model to predict pressure generation around hip replacement stems.
    Dunne NJ; Orr JF
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(6):645-58. PubMed ID: 11201412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of a polyglycolide lactide cement plug restrictor in total hip arthroplasty.
    Yee AJ; Binnington AG; Hearn T; Protzner K; Fornasier VL; Davey JR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Jul; (364):254-66. PubMed ID: 10416416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of prosthetic stem stiffness and of a calcar collar on stresses in the proximal end of the femur with a cemented femoral component.
    Lewis JL; Askew MJ; Wixson RL; Kramer GM; Tarr RR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1984 Feb; 66(2):280-6. PubMed ID: 6693456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
    Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of femoral stem cross-sectional geometry on cement stresses in total hip reconstruction.
    Crowninshield RD; Brand RA; Johnston RC; Milroy JC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (146):71-7. PubMed ID: 7371271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cement mantle stress under retroversion torque at heel-strike.
    Afsharpoya B; Barton DC; Fisher J; Purbach B; Wroblewski M; Stewart TD
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1323-30. PubMed ID: 19879794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of stem insertion rate on the porosity of the cement mantle of hip joint replacements.
    Baleani M; Fognani R; Toni A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12807160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants.
    Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2001 Dec; 123(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11783734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An in-vitro investigation into the cement pressurization achieved during insertion of four different femoral stems.
    Gozzard C; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW; Learmonth ID
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 Nov; 219(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 16312100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiographic assessment of the cement mantle thickness of the femoral stem in total hip replacement: a case study of 112 consecutive implants.
    Isaac GH; Busch CA; Shetty V; Drabu KJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(5):471-7. PubMed ID: 11109854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of fixation of the femoral component without cement and fixation with use of a bone-vacuum cementing technique for the prevention of fat embolism during total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Pitto RP; Koessler M; Kuehle JW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jun; 81(6):831-43. PubMed ID: 10391548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of centrifugation on the mechanical properties of cement. An in vitro total hip-arthroplasty model.
    Chin HC; Stauffer RN; Chao EY
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1990 Mar; 72(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 2312531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cement removal in revision hip arthroplasty. Experience with bone cement added to the cavity in 20 cases.
    Ekelund AL
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1992 Oct; 63(5):549-51. PubMed ID: 1441955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length.
    Chang PB; Mann KA; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):57-69. PubMed ID: 9917591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Properties of composite specimens of old and new bone cement.
    Acharya A; Timperley AJ; Lee AJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jan; 225(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 21381491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Novel methods to study functional loading micromechanics at the stem-cement and cement-bone interface in cemented femoral hip replacements.
    Race A; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(4):788-91. PubMed ID: 19906377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [An original procedure for cement diaphyseal extraction. The segmental cement extraction system or SEG-CES].
    Cordonnier D; Desrousseaux JF; Polveche G; Rattier B; d'Almeida M; Vinchon B
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1996; 82(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 8761103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An in vitro study of femoral intramedullary pressures during hip replacement using modern cement technique.
    Song Y; Goodman SB; Jaffe RA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 May; (302):297-304. PubMed ID: 8168317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.