These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7065096)

  • 21. The specificity of the automated suprathreshold perimeter Fieldmaster 200.
    Gramer E; Steinhauser B; Krieglstein GK
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1982; 218(5):253-5. PubMed ID: 7095449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of Goldmann and Humphrey automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma.
    Trope GE; Britton R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1987 Jul; 71(7):489-93. PubMed ID: 3307897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Automated kinetic perimetry with two peripheral isopters in glaucoma.
    Miller KN; Shields MB; Ollie AR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1989 Sep; 107(9):1316-20. PubMed ID: 2783064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Oculographic automatic perimetry in glaucoma visual field screening: a clinical study--preliminary results in glaucoma patients.
    Ticho U; Zauberman H; Faibish E; Armon H; Weinman J
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1979 Sep; 47(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 520141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)].
    Gramer E; Kontić D; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1981; 183(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7312301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semi-automated kinetic perimetry: Comparison of the Octopus 900 and Humphrey visual field analyzer 3 versus Goldmann perimetry.
    Bevers C; Blanckaert G; Van Keer K; Fils JF; Vandewalle E; Stalmans I
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 97(4):e499-e505. PubMed ID: 30345638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dethecting glaucomatous damage with the Friedmann analyzer compared with te Goldmann perimeter and evaluation of stereoscopic photographs of the optic disk.
    Batko KA; Anctil JL; Anderson DR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 Apr; 95(4):435-47. PubMed ID: 6837687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance of glaucoma progression analysis software in a glaucoma population.
    Arnalich-Montiel F; Casas-Llera P; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Rebolleda G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Mar; 247(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 18982343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reclaiming the Periphery: Automated Kinetic Perimetry for Measuring Peripheral Visual Fields in Patients With Glaucoma.
    Mönter VM; Crabb DP; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Feb; 58(2):868-875. PubMed ID: 28159974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Photopic tangential perimetry.
    Elenius V; Leinonen M
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1986 Apr; 64(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 3727949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Screening for visual field abnormalities with automated perimetry.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA
    Surv Ophthalmol; 1983; 28(3):175-83. PubMed ID: 6422573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A feasible development of computerized perimetry.
    Krakau CE
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1981 Aug; 59(4):485-94. PubMed ID: 7315206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Methods for screening the visual field for glaucoma].
    Volkov VV
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1998; 114(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9584628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of quantitative testing with the Octopus, Humphrey, and Tübingen perimeters.
    Mills RP; Hopp RH; Drance SM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1986 Oct; 102(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 3766667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Microperimetry--comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope--fundus perimetry.
    Rohrschneider K; Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 15672526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An automatic perimeter for glaucoma visual field screening and control. Construction and clinical cases.
    Heijl A; Krakau CE
    Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol; 1975 Oct; 197(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 1081847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Automated combined kinetic and static perimetry: an alternative to standard perimetry in patients with neuro-ophthalmic disease and glaucoma.
    Pineles SL; Volpe NJ; Miller-Ellis E; Galetta SL; Sankar PS; Shindler KS; Maguire MG
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 124(3):363-9. PubMed ID: 16534056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Doyne Memorial Lecture, 1975. Correlation of optic nerve and visual field defects in simple glaucoma.
    Drance SM
    Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962); 1975 Jul; 95(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 1064227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How effective is perimetry in current practice?
    Trobe JD
    Ophthalmology; 1983 Nov; 90(11):1380-3. PubMed ID: 6664679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.