These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7065279)

  • 1. Determination of safety factor for defibrillator waveforms in cultured heart cells.
    Jones JL; Jones RE
    Am J Physiol; 1982 Apr; 242(4):H662-70. PubMed ID: 7065279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved defibrillator waveform safety factor with biphasic waveforms.
    Jones JL; Jones RE
    Am J Physiol; 1983 Jul; 245(1):H60-5. PubMed ID: 6869564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved safety factor for triphasic defibrillator waveforms.
    Jones JL; Jones RE
    Circ Res; 1989 Jun; 64(6):1172-7. PubMed ID: 2720918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dysfunction and safety factor strength-duration curves for biphasic defibrillator waveforms.
    Jones JL; Milne KB
    Am J Physiol; 1994 Jan; 266(1 Pt 2):H263-71. PubMed ID: 8304508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postshock arrhythmias--a possible cause of unsuccessful defibrillation.
    Jones JL; Jones RE
    Crit Care Med; 1980 Mar; 8(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 7363633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decreased defibrillator-induced dysfunction with biphasic rectangular waveforms.
    Jones JL; Jones RE
    Am J Physiol; 1984 Nov; 247(5 Pt 2):H792-6. PubMed ID: 6496760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved cardiac cell excitation with symmetrical biphasic defibrillator waveforms.
    Jones JL; Jones RE; Balasky G
    Am J Physiol; 1987 Dec; 253(6 Pt 2):H1418-24. PubMed ID: 3425743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postcountershock fibrillation in digitalized myocardial cells in vitro.
    Jones JL; Jones RE
    Crit Care Med; 1980 Mar; 8(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 7363634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy and safety of defibrillation with rectangular waves of 2- to 20-milliseconds duration.
    Niebauer MJ; Babbs CF; Geddes LA; Bourland JD
    Crit Care Med; 1983 Feb; 11(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 6822087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional cardiac depression caused by defibrillator shocks. Quantitation of the safety factor for electrical defibrillation.
    Niebauer MJ; Babbs CF; Geddes LA; Carter JE; Bourland JD
    Jpn Heart J; 1984 Sep; 25(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 6512993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the efficacy of defibrillation with the damped sine and constant-tilt current waveforms in the intact animal.
    Hinds M; Ayers GM; Bourland JD; Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Fearnot N
    Med Instrum; 1987 Apr; 21(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 3614037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
    Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Catheter ablation: relationship of defibrillator waveform to the production of postshock ventricular tachyarrhythmias and myocardial damage.
    Chapman PD; Wetherbee JN; Troup PJ; Klopfenstein HS
    Clin Cardiol; 1987 Jul; 10(7):411-5. PubMed ID: 3497002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing defibrillation waveforms for ICDs.
    Kroll MW; Swerdlow CD
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2007 Apr; 18(3):247-63. PubMed ID: 17541815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response of cultured myocardial cells to countershock-type electric field stimulation.
    Jones JL; Lepeschkin E; Jones RE; Rush S
    Am J Physiol; 1978 Aug; 235(2):H214-22. PubMed ID: 686189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT).
    Morrison LJ; Dorian P; Long J; Vermeulen M; Schwartz B; Sawadsky B; Frank J; Cameron B; Burgess R; Shield J; Bagley P; Mausz V; Brewer JE; Lerman BB;
    Resuscitation; 2005 Aug; 66(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 15992986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel rectangular biphasic and monophasic waveforms delivered by a radiofrequency-powered defibrillator compared with conventional capacitor-based waveforms in transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
    Walsh SJ; Manoharan G; Escalona OJ; Santos J; Evans N; Anderson JM; Stevenson M; Allen JD; Adgey AA
    Europace; 2006 Oct; 8(10):873-80. PubMed ID: 17000635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling the interaction between propagating cardiac waves and monophasic and biphasic field stimuli: the importance of the induced spatial excitatory response.
    Fishler MG; Sobie EA; Tung L; Thakor NV
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Dec; 7(12):1183-96. PubMed ID: 8985807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemodynamic responses to two defibrillating trapezoidal waveforms.
    Holmes HR; Bourland JD; Tacker WA; Geddes LA
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 7354734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the efficacy and safety of a novel monophasic waveform delivered by the passive implantable atrial defibrillator with biphasic waveforms in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
    Manoharan G; Evans N; Allen D; Anderson J; Adgey J
    Circulation; 2004 Apr; 109(13):1686-92. PubMed ID: 15051642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.