These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7066637)

  • 1. An assessment of the radiation dose received by staff using fluoroscopic equipment.
    Faulkner K; Moores BM
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Apr; 55(652):272-6. PubMed ID: 7066637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fluoroscopy procedure and equipment changes to reduce staff radiation exposure in the interventional spine suite.
    Plastaras C; Appasamy M; Sayeed Y; McLaughlin C; Charles J; Joshi A; Macron D; Pukenas B
    Pain Physician; 2013; 16(6):E731-8. PubMed ID: 24284854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation Exposure to the Urologist Using an Overcouch Radiation Source Compared With an Undercouch Radiation Source in Contemporary Urology Practice.
    Harris AM
    Urology; 2018 Apr; 114():45-48. PubMed ID: 29305204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occupational exposure in the electrophysiology laboratory: quantifying and minimizing radiation burden.
    Theocharopoulos N; Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Manios E; Vardas P; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 79(944):644-51. PubMed ID: 16641414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship of effective dose to personnel and monitor reading for simulated fluoroscopic irradiation conditions.
    Faulkner K; Marshall NW
    Health Phys; 1993 May; 64(5):502-8. PubMed ID: 8491601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The dependence of the scattered radiation dose to personnel on technique factors in diagnostic radiology.
    Marshall NW; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Jan; 65(769):44-9. PubMed ID: 1486367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures.
    Mohapatra A; Greenberg RK; Mastracci TM; Eagleton MJ; Thornsberry B
    J Vasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 58(3):702-9. PubMed ID: 23810300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimizing radiation dose to patient and staff during fluoroscopic, nasoenteral tube insertions.
    Rudin S; Bednarek DR
    Br J Radiol; 1992 Feb; 65(770):162-6. PubMed ID: 1540808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Exposition of the operator's eye lens and efficacy of radiation shielding in fluoroscopically guided interventions].
    Galster M; Guhl C; Uder M; Adamus R
    Rofo; 2013 May; 185(5):474-81. PubMed ID: 23440647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of radiation doses to patients and surgeons from various fluoroscopically guided orthopaedic surgeries.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Tsapaki V; Kaliakmanis A; Pneumaticos S; Tsoronis F; Koulentianos ED; Papachristou G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 17562655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CT fluoroscopy--guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists.
    Paulson EK; Sheafor DH; Enterline DS; McAdams HP; Yoshizumi TT
    Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):161-7. PubMed ID: 11425990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of radiation dose reduction gloves on exposure parameters, entrance dose rates and eye doses of interventionalists during mobile C-arm fluoroscopic procedures: A phantom study.
    Acho S; Tsoka-Gwegweni J; Stofile C; Banda K; Theron T; Struwig V
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):539-545. PubMed ID: 36924626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues.
    Mahesh M
    Radiographics; 2001; 21(4):1033-45. PubMed ID: 11452079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors of radiation dose in patients undergoing peripherally-inserted central catheter procedure using conventional angiography equipment and flat panel detector-based mobile C-arm fluoroscopy.
    Lee T; Shin SW; Choi D; Cho SK; Hyun D; Do YS; Jeon S; Cha B; Bok EK; Kim S
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1234-8. PubMed ID: 24292900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation exposure in interventional procedures.
    Korir GK; Ochieng BO; Wambani JS; Korir IK; Jowi CY
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Dec; 152(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 22611204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The characteristics of dental X-ray fluoroscopic equipment 'DreamRay 60F'.
    Shin GS; Lee BR; Chang KH; Lee IJ; Lee W; Choi JH; Kim YH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Aug; 140(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 20554581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient and staff dosimetry in vertebroplasty.
    Fitousi NT; Efstathopoulos EP; Delis HB; Kottou S; Kelekis AD; Panayiotakis GS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):E884-9; discussioin E890. PubMed ID: 17077725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous vertebroplasty: assessment of radiation doses and implementation of procedural routines to reduce operator exposure.
    von Wrangel A; Cederblad A; Rodriguez-Catarino M
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Jun; 50(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19363715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scattered radiation doses during per operative screening.
    Sim L
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1989 Mar; 12(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 2705963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.