These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Calcium carbonate and intrauterine devices. Davis RH Lancet; 1977 Oct; 2(8041):762. PubMed ID: 71565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of emergency contraception options over 1 year. Bellows BK; Tak CR; Sanders JN; Turok DK; Schwarz EB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):508.e1-508.e9. PubMed ID: 29409847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices. Cohen R; Sheeder J; Arango N; Teal SB; Tocce K Contraception; 2016 Feb; 93(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26475368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices. Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 25601350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Incrustation of marker threads of intrauterine devices in the uterine cavity and cervix uteri]. Patai K; Berényi M; Gimes G Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986; 108(18):1135-9. PubMed ID: 3788342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrauterine deposition of calcium on copper-bearing intrauterine contraceptive devices. Gosden C; Ross A; Loudon NB Br Med J; 1977 Jan; 1(6055):202-6. PubMed ID: 832075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Morphological characteristics of incrustates of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Patai K; Berényi M; Asztalos M Acta Morphol Hung; 1986; 34(1-2):3-10. PubMed ID: 3105257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between the incrustation of intrauterine devices and the duration of their use. Patai K; Berényi M; Asztalos M Acta Chir Hung; 1985; 26(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 4036457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical significance of organic deposits on intrauterine contraceptive devices]. Salahović S; Kunstelj D Jugosl Ginekol Opstet; 1976; 16(5-6):357-63. PubMed ID: 1027927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?]. Forrest JD Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Contraception with the Lippes Loop D with or without contraceptive foam (author's transl)]. van der Pas H; Thiery M Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1977 Jul; 37(7):622-4. PubMed ID: 885335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Formation of sediment on intrauterine devices]. Sekulović D; Primorac M; Tufegcić N Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1984; 112(11-12):1193-6. PubMed ID: 6544021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Incrustation of intrauterine devices]. Patai K; Berényi M Zentralbl Gynakol; 1982; 104(21):1385-7. PubMed ID: 7164644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]