These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7067937)

  • 41. Let's put appraisal back in performance appraisal: Part 2.
    Graves JP
    Pers J; 1982 Dec; 61(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 10259219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Performance appraisal without stress.
    Slattery PD
    Pers J; 1985 Feb; 64(2):49-50, 52. PubMed ID: 10269884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. How formal appraisal systems work.
    Pucilo NP
    Respir Ther; 1984; 14(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 10265552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A better way to evaluate job performance.
    Thomas DO
    RN; 1987 Jul; 50(7):15-6. PubMed ID: 3648915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Performance appraisal.
    Hyde JP
    Text Rent; 1983 Nov; 67(3):73-4, 76-80. PubMed ID: 10267106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Two goals in every performance appraisal.
    Baker HK; Morgan PI
    Pers J; 1984 Sep; 63(9):74-8. PubMed ID: 10268092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Measuring management performance: . . .a view from the boardroom.
    Ramsey TA
    Trustee; 1979 Mar; 32(3):39-40. PubMed ID: 10240720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Functions and techniques of employee evaluations.
    Holt GA
    Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1983; 5(2):15-7. PubMed ID: 10260704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Developing valid employee appraisal systems.
    Thompson K; Wesley AM
    Health Serv Manager; 1980 Apr; 13(4):5-7, 10. PubMed ID: 10246700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Five steps to improving employee performance.
    Smith M; Wing J
    Superv Manage; 1983 Apr; 28(4):36-42. PubMed ID: 10260658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Employee evaluations. Shifting the emphasis.
    McConnell CR
    AORN J; 1986 Dec; 44(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 3641628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. How to manage employee job performance.
    Grant PC
    Pers Adm; 1981 Aug; 26(8):59-65. PubMed ID: 10252068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Capturing supervisor rating policies: a way to improve performance appraisal effectiveness.
    Hobson CJ; Gibson FW
    Pers Adm; 1984 Mar; 29(3):59-68. PubMed ID: 10265501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A critique of performance appraisal systems.
    Yager E
    Pers J; 1981 Feb; 60(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10249832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The performance appraisal: the most needed and neglected supervisory tool.
    Binis RA
    Superv Manage; 1978 Oct; 23(10):12-6. PubMed ID: 10238649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Formulating usable objectives for manager performance appraisal.
    Allan P; Rosenberg S
    Pers J; 1978 Nov; 57(11):626-9, 640, 642. PubMed ID: 10239501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Evaluation of professional nurses' performance in hospital units].
    da Luz HB; Lunardi N
    Rev Bras Enferm; 1986; 39(2-3):81-5. PubMed ID: 3648846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A three-part performance appraisal system.
    Khan MK
    Can J Med Technol; 1982 Jun; 44(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 10256198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Getting a handle on performance measurement.
    Scott S
    Adm Radiol; 1988 Mar; 7(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 10286583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.