These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7069057)

  • 1. Detection of sinusoidally amplitude modulated noise by the chinchilla.
    Salvi RJ; Giraudi DM; Henderson D; Hamernik RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Feb; 71(2):424-9. PubMed ID: 7069057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of frequency and rate modulation by the chinchilla.
    Long GR; Clark WW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Apr; 75(4):1184-90. PubMed ID: 6725767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Amplitude modulation thresholds in chinchillas with high-frequency hearing loss.
    Henderson D; Salvi R; Pavek G; Hamernik R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Apr; 75(4):1177-83. PubMed ID: 6725766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of intensity decrements by the chinchilla.
    Graf CJ; Saunders SS; Salvi RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Feb; 91(2):1062-8. PubMed ID: 1556307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Threshold shifts in chinchillas exposed to octave bands of noise centered at 63 and 1000 Hz for three days(a).
    Burdick CK; Patterson JH; Mozo BT; Camp RT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Aug; 64(2):458-66. PubMed ID: 712007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gap detection by the chinchilla.
    Giraudi D; Salvi R; Henderson D; Hamernik R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Sep; 68(3):802-6. PubMed ID: 7419814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of auditory-evoked potentials and behavioral thresholds in the normal and noise-exposed chinchilla.
    Henderson D; Hamernik RP; Salvi RJ; Ahroon WA
    Audiology; 1983; 22(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 6847532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymptotic threshold shift in chinchillas exposed to impulse noise.
    Blakeslee EA; Hynson K; Hamernik RP; Henderson D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Mar; 63(3):876-82. PubMed ID: 670555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binaural modulation masking.
    Grantham DW; Bacon SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1340-9. PubMed ID: 2030221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monaural and interaural temporal modulation transfer functions measured with 5-kHz carriers.
    Stellmack MA; Viemeister NF; Byrne AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2507-18. PubMed ID: 16266171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of periodic rest on physiological measures of auditory sensitivity following exposure to noise.
    Sinex DG; Clark WW; Bohne BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1265-73. PubMed ID: 3680783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of low-frequency "conditioning" on hearing loss from high-frequency exposure.
    Subramaniam M; Henderson D; Spongr V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):952-6. PubMed ID: 8445129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asymptotic noise-induced temporary threshold shift in chinchilla measured by the auditory evoked response.
    Woodford C
    Audiology; 1977; 16(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 836250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds.
    Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Nov; 66(5):1364-80. PubMed ID: 500975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bacon SP; Viemeister NF
    Audiology; 1985; 24(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 3994589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conditioning-induced protection from impulse noise in female and male chinchillas.
    McFadden SL; Zheng XY; Ding DL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2162-8. PubMed ID: 10790042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of 'conditioning' exposures on hearing loss from traumatic exposure.
    Campo P; Subramaniam M; Henderson D
    Hear Res; 1991 Oct; 55(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 1757287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binaural Interaction Effects of 30-50 Hz Auditory Steady State Responses.
    Gransier R; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e305-e315. PubMed ID: 28358747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Frequency selectivity in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus) studied with narrow-band noise masking.
    Saunders JC; Bock GR; Fahrbach SE
    Sens Processes; 1978 Jun; 2(2):80-9. PubMed ID: 715471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.