These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7069378)

  • 1. Bridging temporal gaps between CS and US in autoshaping: insertion of other stimuli before, during, and after CS.
    Kaplan PS; Hearst E
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1982 Apr; 8(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 7069378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of a stimulus intervening between CS and US in autoshaping.
    Rescorla RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1982 Apr; 8(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 7069375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of signaling intertrial unconditioned stimuli in autoshaping.
    Durlach PJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1983 Oct; 9(4):374-89. PubMed ID: 6644244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Duration of signals for intertrial reinforcement and nonreinforcement in random control procedures.
    Cooper LD; Aronson L; Balsam PD; Gibbon J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 2303790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CS-US interval as a determinant of the form of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responses.
    Holland PC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Apr; 6(2):155-74. PubMed ID: 7373230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues present during training of that specific stimulus.
    Miller RR; Barnet RC; Grahame NJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 1619393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Summation in autoshaping is affected by the similarity of the visual stimuli to the stimulation they replace.
    Pearce JM; Redhead ES; George DN
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Apr; 28(2):175-89. PubMed ID: 11987874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Second-order conditioning of the pigeon's key-peck using an autoshaping procedure.
    Green L; Schweitzer L
    Am J Psychol; 1980 Mar; 93(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 7396046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis of the facilitative effect of similarity on second-order conditioning.
    Rescorla RA; Gillan DJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1980 Oct; 6(4):339-51. PubMed ID: 7430952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Formation of tone-US associations does not interfere with the formation of context-US associations in pigeons.
    Balsam PD; Gibbon J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Oct; 14(4):401-12. PubMed ID: 3183580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid contextual conditioning in autoshaping.
    Balsam PD; Schwartz AL
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Oct; 7(4):382-93. PubMed ID: 7288369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Latent inhibition of a CS during CS-US pairings.
    Hall G; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1979 Jan; 5(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 528877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of contextual conditioning and unconditional stimulus presentation on performance in appetitive conditioning.
    Bouton ME; Rosengard C; Achenbach GG; Peck CA; Brooks DC
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1993 Feb; 46(1):63-95. PubMed ID: 8456178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The CS-US interval and taste aversion learning: a brief look.
    Schafe GE; Sollars SI; Bernstein IL
    Behav Neurosci; 1995 Aug; 109(4):799-802. PubMed ID: 7576224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posttraining shifts in the overshadowing stimulus-unconditioned stimulus interval alleviates the overshadowing deficit.
    Blaisdell AP; Denniston JC; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Jan; 25(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 9987855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neurophysiological substrates of context conditioning in Hermissenda suggest a temporally invariant form of activity-dependent neuronal facilitation.
    Talk AC; Muzzio IA; Matzel LD
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 1999 Sep; 72(2):95-117. PubMed ID: 10438650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing response generation rules.
    Miller RR; Schachtman TR; Matzel LD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Oct; 14(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 3183581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Local time horizons in Pavlovian learning.
    Barnet RC; Grahame NJ; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1993 Jul; 19(3):215-30. PubMed ID: 8340767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal parameters of the feature positive effect.
    Nallan GB; Pace GM; McCoy DF; Zentall TR
    Am J Psychol; 1979 Dec; 92(4):703-10. PubMed ID: 532834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metabolic effects of blocking tone conditioning on the rat auditory system.
    Poremba A; Jones D; Gonzalez-Lima F
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 1997 Sep; 68(2):154-71. PubMed ID: 9322258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.