These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. "Fetal rights" and the new eugenics. Hubbard R Sci People; 1984; 16(2):7-9, 27-29. PubMed ID: 11649544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Maternal rights versus fetal interests: an ethical issue with nursing implications. Sise CB J Prof Nurs; 1988; 4(4):262-7. PubMed ID: 3417963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Regulation of pre-conception agreements: a synthesis of individual rights and community values. Shewchuk TR Health Law J; 1993; 1():147-89. PubMed ID: 10569854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. State v. Oakley: infringing on women's reproductive rights. Schehr AR Wis Womens Law J; 2003; 18(2):281-97. PubMed ID: 15568247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of forensic issues on women's rights. Walker LE Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1988; 528():361-72. PubMed ID: 3048167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Your rights when you take maternity leave. Horsley JE RN; 1987 Dec; 50(12):55-8. PubMed ID: 3685814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. States struggle with new ethical questions over the beginning, end of life. Moskowitz DB J Am Health Policy; 1993; 3(3):46-9. PubMed ID: 10125736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. An evaluation of the costs of pregnancy disability. McDonough CC; Kistler LH Empl Benefits J; 1981 Dec; 6(4):7-11, 15. PubMed ID: 10253399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Maternal smoking during pregnancy: social, medical, and legal perspectives on the conception of a human being. Birenbaum-Carmeli D Health Care Women Int; 1995; 16(1):57-73. PubMed ID: 7706141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Mother's rights prevail: In re A.C. and the status of forced obstetrical intervention in the District of Columbia. Neale H J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Jul; 23(7):208-13. PubMed ID: 10105493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The Court stands by abortion. Press A; Camper D Newsweek; 1983 Jun; 101(26):62-3. PubMed ID: 10260662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Update: new rights for pregnant employees. Lines PM Pers J; 1979 Jan; 58(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 10239889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade. Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Under the radar. Tumulty K; Novak V Time; 2003 Jan; 161(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 12577595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]