BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7071319)

  • 1. Cervical cytology screening in two Yorkshire areas: results of testing.
    Parkin DM; Leach K; Cobb P; Clayden AD
    Public Health; 1982 Jan; 96(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 7071319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical cytology in Greenland and occurrence of cervical carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, and dysplasia. Extent and impact of uncoordinated screening activity 1976-1985.
    Højgaard Nielsen N; Jensen H; Hansen PK
    Arctic Med Res; 1988 Oct; 47(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 3214508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cohort study of cervical cancer screening in British Columbia.
    Boyes DA; Morrison B; Knox EG; Draper GJ; Miller AB
    Clin Invest Med; 1982; 5(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 7116711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mass population screening for cervical cancer in Miyagi Prefecture.
    Yajima A; Higashiiwai H; Sato A; Watanabe M; Hoshi K; Mori T; Yonemoto Y; Suzuki M; Noda K
    Gynecol Oncol; 1979 Oct; 8(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 499921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Arkansas cervical cancer program.
    Steinkamp RC; Roman-Lopez J; Kenney JA; Hairston MG; Hylton S; Hammett WN; Marsh S; Becton P; Collier S
    J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Jan; 76(1):312-22. PubMed ID: 6444400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Population screening for cervix carcinoma in the city of Rotterdam, 1st round].
    van der Lee-Bijlsma A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1981 Dec; 125(49):2012-5. PubMed ID: 7322220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology in a group of New Zealand women using contraception: a preliminary report. The New Zealand Contraception and Health Study Group.
    N Z Med J; 1989 Jul; 102(872):369-71. PubMed ID: 2797552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adolescents with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Schydlower M; Greeenberg H; Patterson PH
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1981 Nov; 20(11):723-6. PubMed ID: 7297012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervicovaginal cytology in an indigent population. Comparison of results for 1964, 1981 and 1989.
    Costa MJ; Grimes C; Tackett E; Naib ZM
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 1994635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abnormal cervical smears: are we in for an epidemic?
    Wolfendale MR; King S; Usherwood MM
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Aug; 287(6391):526-8. PubMed ID: 6411205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [1-year results in the detection of precanceroses and carcinoma of the uterine cervix in Baranja].
    Milojković M; Pajtler M; Makarović Z; Lederer B; Jarcov R
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1986; 26(5-6):119-22. PubMed ID: 3657276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Papanicolaou smears in Victoria: are the wrong women being screened?
    Mitchell H; Drake M; Medley G
    Med J Aust; 1987 Dec 7-21; 147(11-12):559-60. PubMed ID: 3696044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in sexually active teenagers and young adults. Results of data analysis of mass Papanicolaou screening of 796,337 women in the United States in 1981.
    Sadeghi SB; Hsieh EW; Gunn SW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Mar; 148(6):726-9. PubMed ID: 6702940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence and prevalence of preclinical carcinoma of cervix in a British population.
    Parkin DM; Hodgson P; Clayden AD
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Jul; 89(7):564-70. PubMed ID: 7093172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of regular 3-yearly screening on the incidence of cervical smears: the Leiden experience.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ; Wijsman-Grootendorst A
    Cytopathology; 1990; 1(4):201-10. PubMed ID: 2101670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The significance of atypical cervical cytology in an older population.
    Kaminski PF; Sorosky JI; Wheelock JB; Stevens CW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jan; 73(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 2535763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Condyloms, dysplasia and carcinomas of cervix: a twenty years experience (1980 - 1999)].
    Diallo AS; Sam Giao M; Fenton CE; Afoutou JM
    Dakar Med; 2003; 48(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 15776627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urbanization and the incidence of abnormalities of squamous and glandular epithelium of the cervix.
    Boon ME; van Ravenswaay Claasen HH; van Westering RP; Kok LP
    Cancer; 2003 Feb; 99(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 12589639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Significance of physical findings in diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
    Moller KA; Fogh H; Moller PE; Strandbygard K
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 5041568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Cardiff Cervical Cytology Study. Prevalence and epidemiology of cervical neoplasia.
    Sweetnam P; Evans DM; Hibbard BM; Jones JM
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1981 Jun; 35(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 7299341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.