167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7071333)
1. Frequency of anaphylactoid reactions during intravenous urography with radiographic contrast media at two different temperatures.
Turner E; Kentor P; Melamed JL; Rao G; Zeitz HJ
Radiology; 1982 May; 143(2):327-9. PubMed ID: 7071333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Severe reactions to contrast material by three consecutive routes: intravenous, subcutaneous, and intraarterial.
Cho KJ; Thornbury JR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Sep; 131(3):509-10. PubMed ID: 99000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Elevated risk of anaphylactoid reaction from radiographic contrast media is associated with both beta-blocker exposure and cardiovascular disorders.
Lang DM; Alpern MB; Visintainer PF; Smith ST
Arch Intern Med; 1993 Sep; 153(17):2033-40. PubMed ID: 8102844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media: a prospective study of the effect of rapid bolus injection on nausea and anaphylactoid reactions.
Federle MP; Willis LL; Swanson DP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 9606371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Emergency treatment of anaphylactoid reactions to radiographic contrast materials.
Mueller PG
Md Med J; 1985 Mar; 34(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 3837143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical evaluation of cardiovascular reactions to renal contrast media using an impedance method (author's transl)].
Brutschin P; Vock P; Fuchs WA
Rofo; 1976 Oct; 125(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 136404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A study of iopamidol (Iopamiron 370) in intravenous urography in the patients with previous adverse reactions to contrast media and history of allergy].
Kondo K; Kamidono S; Hamami G
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1988 Oct; 34(10):1845-51. PubMed ID: 3245531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Adverse reactions to contrast media for intravenous use. A comparison between ionic and nonionic media].
Urrutia M; Macharaviaya A; RodrÃguez R
Rev Med Panama; 1995; 20(1-2):20-4. PubMed ID: 7480899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of N tau-methylhistamine concentrations in urine as a parameter for histamine release by radiographic contrast media.
Keyzer JJ; Udding H; de Vries K
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1984; 53(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 6200265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anaphylactoid reaction during intravenous pyelography.
Haber H
Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 1980 Jun; 5(7):481-4. PubMed ID: 7464567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Risk of incompatibility reactions in the repeated use of contrast media in urography].
Rothenberger K; Ring J
Fortschr Med; 1979 Sep; 97(33):1429-32. PubMed ID: 39885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Premedication with H1- and H2-receptor antagonists for intravenous urography using contrast media].
Reimann HJ; Tauber R; Kramann B; Gmeinwieser J; Schmidt U; Reiser M
Rofo; 1986 Feb; 144(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 2869551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased risk for anaphylactoid reaction from contrast media in patients on beta-adrenergic blockers or with asthma.
Lang DM; Alpern MB; Visintainer PF; Smith ST
Ann Intern Med; 1991 Aug; 115(4):270-6. PubMed ID: 1677239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gender risk for anaphylactoid reaction to radiographic contrast media.
Lang DM; Alpern MB; Visintainer PF; Smith ST
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1995 Apr; 95(4):813-7. PubMed ID: 7722160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of renal function before and after intravenous injection of uroangiographic water soluble contrast media in men.
Verbaeys A; Lameire N; Oosterlinck W
Acta Urol Belg; 1989; 57(4):795-801. PubMed ID: 2631582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Case report: recurrent anaphylactic shock to radiographic contrast media. Evidence supporting an exceptional IgE-mediated reaction.
Kanny G; Maria Y; Mentre B; Moneret-Vautrin DA
Allerg Immunol (Paris); 1993 Dec; 25(10):425-30. PubMed ID: 8155272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective evaluation of adverse reactions to iodine-containing contrast media after ERCP.
Draganov PV; Forsmark CE
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Dec; 68(6):1098-101. PubMed ID: 19028218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systemic response to excretory urography. Work in progress.
Fischer HW; Katzberg RW; Morris TW; Spataro RF
Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 6701329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increased urine histamine and contrast media reactions.
Kaliner M; Dyer J; Merlin S; Shelton A; Greenhill A; Treadwell G; McKenna W; Lieberman P
Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(2):116-8. PubMed ID: 6533100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adverse reactions to urographic contrast medium. Rapid versus slow injection rate.
Jensen N; Dorph S
Br J Radiol; 1980 Jul; 53(631):659-61. PubMed ID: 7426887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]