These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7071333)
41. [Excretory urography--current indications of the status of a conventional diagnostic method. Status of nonionic and ionic contrast media]. Porst H; Mayer R Fortschr Med; 1985 Aug; 103(30):755-8. PubMed ID: 4043912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Iohexol vs. diatrizoate. A comparative study in intravenous urography. Rankin RN; Eng FW Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S112-4. PubMed ID: 3972525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Fatal anaphylactic shock in a patient treated with beta-blockers]. Laxenaire MC; Torrens J; Moneret-Vautrin DA Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 1984; 3(6):453-5. PubMed ID: 6151372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Intravenous contrast media in uroradiology: evaluation of safety and tolerability in almost 50,000 patients. Wendt-Nordahl G; Rotert H; Trojan L; Michel MS; Peters CR; Alken P; Knoll T Med Princ Pract; 2006; 15(5):358-61. PubMed ID: 16888393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Injection rate: a factor in contrast reactions? Duddy MJ; Manns RA; Wormald SA Clin Radiol; 1990 Jan; 41(1):42-3. PubMed ID: 2297966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Contrast media reactions: data analysis and hypothesis. Lalli AF Radiology; 1980 Jan; 134(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 6985735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of bronchospasm during excretory urography. Littner MR; Rosenfield AT; Ulreich S; Putman CE Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 866632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Severe anaphylactoid reaction to radiographic contrast media. Recurrences despites premedication with diphenhydramine and prednisone. Madowitz JS; Schweiger MJ JAMA; 1979 Jun; 241(26):2813-5. PubMed ID: 448843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Adverse reactions to high osmolarity contrast media. A comparative-prospective study]. Urrutia M; Macharaviaya A; RodrÃguez R Rev Med Panama; 1994 Jan; 19(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 7938712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Development of a life-threatening anaphylactoid reaction following administration of ioversol in a child. Zuckerman GB; Riess PL; Patel L; Constantinescu AR; Rosenfeld DL Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Apr; 29(4):295-7. PubMed ID: 10199911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Radiographic findings and hypotensive reactions in excretory urography. Munechika H; Hasegawa N; Gokan T; Kushihashi T; Honda M; Ryu K Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Nov; 49(11):1361-5. PubMed ID: 2602098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. An approach to the performance of contrast studies in contrast material-reactive persons. Zweiman B; Mishkin MM; Hildreth EA Ann Intern Med; 1975 Aug; 83(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 1147448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Changes in complement and coagulation factors in a patient suffering a severe anaphylactoid reaction to injected contrast material: some considerations of pathogenesis. Lasser EC; Lang JH; Lyon SG; Hamblin AE Invest Radiol; 1980; 15(6 Suppl):S6-12. PubMed ID: 7203950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Induction of micronuclei in lymphocytes of patients undergoing excretory urography with ioversol. Cochran ST; Norman A Invest Radiol; 1994 Feb; 29(2):210-2. PubMed ID: 8169099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]